PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UDHY.DE vs. GFEA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UDHY.DE vs. GFEA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (UDHY.DE) and VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (GFEA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UDHY.DE achieves a -1.14% return, which is significantly lower than GFEA.DE's 5.14% return.


UDHY.DE

1D
0.01%
1M
1.21%
YTD
-1.14%
6M
-1.88%
1Y
0.71%
3Y*
3.98%
5Y*
10Y*

GFEA.DE

1D
-0.60%
1M
1.51%
YTD
5.14%
6M
4.54%
1Y
7.23%
3Y*
6.53%
5Y*
4.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UDHY.DE vs. GFEA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
UDHY.DE
iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-1.14%-3.92%13.24%8.32%-4.04%
GFEA.DE
VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF
5.14%-2.31%12.20%6.70%-3.32%

Correlation

The correlation between UDHY.DE and GFEA.DE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2022

0.69

The correlation between UDHY.DE and GFEA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UDHY.DE vs. GFEA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UDHY.DE
UDHY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
UDHY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDHY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDHY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
UDHY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDHY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

GFEA.DE
GFEA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GFEA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFEA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFEA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
GFEA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFEA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UDHY.DE vs. GFEA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (UDHY.DE) and VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (GFEA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UDHY.DEGFEA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.22

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.08

2.92

-2.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.19

9.56

-9.37

UDHY.DE vs. GFEA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDHY.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the GFEA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDHY.DE and GFEA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UDHY.DEGFEA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

1.22

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.77

-0.43

Drawdowns

UDHY.DE vs. GFEA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDHY.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.23%, smaller than the maximum GFEA.DE drawdown of -22.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDHY.DE and GFEA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UDHY.DEGFEA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.23%

-22.87%

+10.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.17%

-2.44%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.23%

-9.98%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.76%

-0.60%

-7.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.84%

-3.37%

-1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

0.75%

+1.92%

Volatility

UDHY.DE vs. GFEA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (UDHY.DE) is 0.99%, while VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (GFEA.DE) has a volatility of 1.85%. This indicates that UDHY.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFEA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UDHY.DEGFEA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

1.85%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.73%

4.63%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.32%

5.85%

+0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.04%

7.72%

+0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.04%

9.51%

-1.47%

UDHY.DE vs. GFEA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UDHY.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GFEA.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

UDHY.DE vs. GFEA.DE - Dividend Comparison

UDHY.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, while GFEA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GFEA.DE
VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UDHY.DE
iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.67%7.37%6.63%5.74%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


UDHY.DE and GFEA.DE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UDHY.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UDHY.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GFEA.DE.

UDHY.DE tracks ICE BofAML US High Yield Constrained, while GFEA.DE tracks ICE Global Fallen Angel High Yield 10% Constrained. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UDHY.DE and 0.40% for GFEA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UDHY.DE and GFEA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer