UDBPX vs. PGTQX
Compare and contrast key facts about UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund (UDBPX) and PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R6 (PGTQX).
UDBPX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Oct 23, 2018. PGTQX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Feb 3, 2012.
Performance
UDBPX vs. PGTQX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UDBPX vs. PGTQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UDBPX UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund | 0.17% | 6.96% | 1.55% | 4.53% | -10.41% | -2.43% | 6.80% | 6.79% | 2.03% |
PGTQX PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R6 | -1.22% | 11.14% | 0.31% | 8.46% | -22.33% | -5.95% | 10.07% | 15.22% | 2.56% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UDBPX achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly higher than PGTQX's -1.22% return.
UDBPX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- YTD
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 4.22%
- 3Y*
- 3.41%
- 5Y*
- 0.46%
- 10Y*
- —
PGTQX
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- -1.22%
- 6M
- -0.79%
- 1Y
- 5.68%
- 3Y*
- 5.04%
- 5Y*
- -1.32%
- 10Y*
- 1.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UDBPX vs. PGTQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UDBPX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PGTQX's 0.54% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UDBPX vs. PGTQX — Risk / Return Rank
UDBPX
PGTQX
UDBPX vs. PGTQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund (UDBPX) and PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R6 (PGTQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UDBPX | PGTQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 1.09 | +0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.75 | 1.60 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.20 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 1.34 | +1.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.36 | 5.35 | +2.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UDBPX | PGTQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 1.09 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | -0.20 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.11 | +0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between UDBPX and PGTQX is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
UDBPX vs. PGTQX - Dividend Comparison
UDBPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, less than PGTQX's 3.68% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UDBPX UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund | 3.52% | 3.12% | 2.84% | 2.15% | 1.46% | 1.03% | 4.11% | 2.69% | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PGTQX PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R6 | 3.68% | 4.00% | 4.47% | 2.96% | 3.53% | 3.36% | 3.94% | 8.65% | 3.63% | 3.41% | 4.02% | 3.85% |
Drawdowns
UDBPX vs. PGTQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UDBPX drawdown since its inception was -15.45%, smaller than the maximum PGTQX drawdown of -44.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDBPX and PGTQX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UDBPX | PGTQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.45% | -44.72% | +29.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.94% | -4.55% | +2.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.55% | -31.46% | +16.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | -27.96% | +26.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.19% | -20.10% | +14.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.65% | 1.14% | -0.49% |
Volatility
UDBPX vs. PGTQX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund (UDBPX) is 1.38%, while PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R6 (PGTQX) has a volatility of 2.19%. This indicates that UDBPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGTQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UDBPX | PGTQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.38% | 2.19% | -0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.26% | 3.31% | -1.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.82% | 5.25% | -1.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.97% | 6.50% | -1.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.52% | 21.51% | -16.99% |