UDBPX vs. GSGIX
UDBPX (UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund) and GSGIX (Goldman Sachs Global Core Fixed Income Fund) are both Global Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, UDBPX returned -0.12%/yr vs -0.48%/yr for GSGIX. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. UDBPX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for GSGIX.
Performance
UDBPX vs. GSGIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UDBPX achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly lower than GSGIX's -0.38% return.
UDBPX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- 6M
- -0.66%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 1Y
- 2.18%
- 3Y*
- 3.65%
- 5Y*
- -0.12%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.82%
GSGIX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- 6M
- -0.62%
- YTD
- -0.38%
- 1Y
- 1.81%
- 3Y*
- 3.17%
- 5Y*
- -0.48%
- 10Y*
- 1.49%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
UDBPX vs. GSGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UDBPX UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund | -0.47% | 6.96% | 1.55% | 4.53% | -10.41% | -2.43% | 6.80% | 6.79% | 2.03% |
GSGIX Goldman Sachs Global Core Fixed Income Fund | -0.38% | 5.09% | 0.86% | 7.66% | -12.98% | -2.59% | 8.90% | 10.17% | 1.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between UDBPX and GSGIX is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2018 | 0.83 |
The correlation between UDBPX and GSGIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UDBPX vs. GSGIX — Risk / Return Rank
UDBPX
GSGIX
UDBPX vs. GSGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund (UDBPX) and Goldman Sachs Global Core Fixed Income Fund (GSGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UDBPX | GSGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.13 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 0.79 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.31 | 2.04 | +0.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UDBPX vs. GSGIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UDBPX drawdown since its inception was -15.45%, smaller than the maximum GSGIX drawdown of -19.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDBPX and GSGIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UDBPX | GSGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.45% | -19.90% | +4.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.37% | -3.18% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.03% | -4.49% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.47% | -17.27% | +2.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.96% | -5.69% | +3.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.03% | -2.71% | -2.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 1.23% | -0.26% |
Volatility
UDBPX vs. GSGIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund (UDBPX) is 0.82%, while Goldman Sachs Global Core Fixed Income Fund (GSGIX) has a volatility of 0.92%. This indicates that UDBPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UDBPX | GSGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.82% | 0.92% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.53% | 2.78% | -0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.39% | 3.31% | +0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 4.68% | +0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.48% | 4.12% | +0.36% |
UDBPX vs. GSGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UDBPX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GSGIX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
UDBPX vs. GSGIX - Dividend Comparison
UDBPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than GSGIX's 2.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSGIX Goldman Sachs Global Core Fixed Income Fund | 2.80% | 3.01% | 2.64% | 2.12% | 1.60% | 1.32% | 5.04% | 4.13% | 1.28% | 1.74% | 1.40% | 5.97% |
UDBPX UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund | 3.38% | 3.12% | 2.84% | 2.15% | 1.46% | 1.03% | 4.11% | 2.69% | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UDBPX and GSGIX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSGIX has higher volatility (0.92%) compared to UDBPX (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDBPX dropped -15.45% vs GSGIX's -19.90%.
GSGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UDBPX and GSGIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer