GSGIX vs. EAIIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Global Core Fixed Income Fund (GSGIX) and Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund (EAIIX).
GSGIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Aug 1, 1991. EAIIX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Jun 26, 2007.
Performance
GSGIX vs. EAIIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSGIX vs. EAIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSGIX Goldman Sachs Global Core Fixed Income Fund | -1.27% | 5.09% | 0.86% | 7.66% | -12.98% | -2.59% | 8.90% | 10.17% | -0.12% | 2.43% |
EAIIX Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund | 0.92% | 13.67% | -2.81% | 8.45% | -11.29% | -5.71% | 9.33% | 6.09% | -2.67% | 10.58% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSGIX achieves a -1.27% return, which is significantly lower than EAIIX's 0.92% return. Over the past 10 years, GSGIX has underperformed EAIIX with an annualized return of 1.66%, while EAIIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.45% annualized return.
GSGIX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -2.84%
- YTD
- -1.27%
- 6M
- -0.19%
- 1Y
- 2.58%
- 3Y*
- 2.91%
- 5Y*
- -0.20%
- 10Y*
- 1.66%
EAIIX
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -2.11%
- YTD
- 0.92%
- 6M
- 3.56%
- 1Y
- 11.83%
- 3Y*
- 5.35%
- 5Y*
- 1.00%
- 10Y*
- 2.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSGIX vs. EAIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSGIX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than EAIIX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSGIX vs. EAIIX — Risk / Return Rank
GSGIX
EAIIX
GSGIX vs. EAIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Global Core Fixed Income Fund (GSGIX) and Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund (EAIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSGIX | EAIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 2.42 | -1.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.24 | 3.80 | -2.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.56 | -0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 5.16 | -4.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.14 | 17.88 | -13.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSGIX | EAIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 2.42 | -1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.15 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.45 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.16 | 0.53 | +0.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSGIX and EAIIX is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GSGIX vs. EAIIX - Dividend Comparison
GSGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than EAIIX's 8.64% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSGIX Goldman Sachs Global Core Fixed Income Fund | 2.75% | 3.01% | 2.64% | 2.12% | 1.60% | 1.32% | 5.04% | 4.13% | 1.28% | 1.74% | 1.40% | 5.97% |
EAIIX Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund | 8.64% | 7.44% | 4.80% | 4.42% | 4.54% | 5.37% | 6.13% | 5.69% | 4.70% | 4.43% | 5.53% | 5.89% |
Drawdowns
GSGIX vs. EAIIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSGIX drawdown since its inception was -19.90%, smaller than the maximum EAIIX drawdown of -25.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSGIX and EAIIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSGIX | EAIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.90% | -25.32% | +5.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.18% | -2.33% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.27% | -24.13% | +6.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.90% | -25.32% | +5.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.52% | -2.33% | -4.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -5.09% | +2.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.80% | 0.67% | +0.13% |
Volatility
GSGIX vs. EAIIX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Global Core Fixed Income Fund (GSGIX) and Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund (EAIIX) have volatilities of 1.45% and 1.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSGIX | EAIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.45% | 1.41% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.20% | 2.10% | +0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.33% | 4.85% | -1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.61% | 6.56% | -1.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.09% | 5.50% | -1.41% |