PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UD08.L vs. UC96.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UD08.L vs. UC96.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UD08.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UD08.L achieves a 25.78% return, which is significantly higher than UC96.L's 5.73% return.


UD08.L

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.53%
YTD
25.78%
6M
28.13%
1Y
43.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UC96.L

1D
0.78%
1M
3.59%
YTD
5.73%
6M
6.22%
1Y
18.61%
3Y*
9.15%
5Y*
7.85%
10Y*
10.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UD08.L vs. UC96.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between UD08.L and UC96.L is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025

-0.11

UD08.L vs. UC96.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UD08.L
UC96.L

Technology

32.6%
21.1%

Industrials

14.6%
19.5%

Financial Services

12.6%
18.7%

Communication Services

10.6%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
4.0%

Healthcare

6.4%
19.0%

Utilities

4.4%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
5.2%

Energy

2.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.4%
5.7%

Real Estate

0.2%

-

Technology

UD08.L
32.6%
UC96.L
21.1%

Industrials

UD08.L
14.6%
UC96.L
19.5%

Financial Services

UD08.L
12.6%
UC96.L
18.7%

Communication Services

UD08.L
10.6%
UC96.L
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

UD08.L
10.6%
UC96.L
4.0%

Healthcare

UD08.L
6.4%
UC96.L
19.0%

Utilities

UD08.L
4.4%
UC96.L
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

UD08.L
3.9%
UC96.L
5.2%

Energy

UD08.L
2.9%
UC96.L
1.9%

Basic Materials

UD08.L
1.4%
UC96.L
5.7%

Real Estate

UD08.L
0.2%
UC96.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UD08.L vs. UC96.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UD08.L
UD08.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
UD08.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UD08.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
UD08.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
UD08.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
UD08.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

UC96.L
UC96.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
UC96.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC96.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC96.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UC96.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC96.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UD08.L vs. UC96.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UD08.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UD08.LUC96.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.31

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.75

2.70

+4.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.31

8.77

+12.54

UD08.L vs. UC96.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UD08.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is higher than the UC96.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UD08.L and UC96.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UD08.LUC96.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10

1.75

+1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.71

0.72

+1.99

Drawdowns

UD08.L vs. UC96.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UD08.L drawdown since its inception was -6.43%, smaller than the maximum UC96.L drawdown of -27.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UD08.L and UC96.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UD08.LUC96.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.43%

-27.20%

+20.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.43%

-6.87%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

0.00%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.41%

-4.30%

+2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

2.12%

-0.08%

Volatility

UD08.L vs. UC96.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UD08.L) is 2.74%, while UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L) has a volatility of 2.89%. This indicates that UD08.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UC96.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UD08.LUC96.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.74%

2.89%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

7.49%

+4.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.00%

10.71%

+3.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.97%

14.04%

+0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.97%

15.95%

-0.98%

UD08.L vs. UC96.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UD08.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than UC96.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

UD08.L vs. UC96.L - Dividend Comparison

UD08.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UC96.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
UC96.L
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.01%0.01%0.01%0.78%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.01%0.02%0.02%0.01%
UD08.L
UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UD08.L and UC96.L have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UC96.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UC96.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UD08.L.

UD08.L is categorized as Commodities, while UC96.L is Large Cap Value Equities. UD08.L tracks UBS CMCI Ex-Agriculture Ex-Livestock Capped (GBP Hedged), while UC96.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for UD08.L and 0.25% for UC96.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UD08.L and UC96.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer