UD07.L vs. XDBG.L
UD07.L (UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and XDBG.L (Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged) are both Commodities funds - UD07.L tracks the UBS BCOM Constant Maturity while XDBG.L tracks the Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward (GBP Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UD07.L returned 13.48%/yr vs 14.47%/yr for XDBG.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UD07.L charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for XDBG.L.
Performance
UD07.L vs. XDBG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UD07.L achieves a 21.43% return, which is significantly lower than XDBG.L's 23.55% return.
UD07.L
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- YTD
- 21.43%
- 6M
- 20.72%
- 1Y
- 35.14%
- 3Y*
- 12.39%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- —
XDBG.L
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 23.55%
- 6M
- 26.11%
- 1Y
- 45.42%
- 3Y*
- 19.29%
- 5Y*
- 14.47%
- 10Y*
- 8.76%
UD07.L vs. XDBG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UD07.L UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 21.43% | 9.88% | 6.26% | -10.97% | 32.08% | 31.93% | -1.26% | 2.82% | -2.04% |
XDBG.L Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged | 23.55% | 25.68% | 8.15% | -11.18% | 18.13% | 38.25% | -3.17% | 5.10% | -13.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between UD07.L and XDBG.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2018 | 0.67 |
The correlation between UD07.L and XDBG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
UD07.L vs. XDBG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UD07.L
XDBG.L
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
UD07.L
XDBG.L
Technology
UD07.L
XDBG.L
Industrials
UD07.L
XDBG.L
Financial Services
UD07.L
XDBG.L
Consumer Cyclical
UD07.L
XDBG.L
Healthcare
UD07.L
XDBG.L
Utilities
UD07.L
XDBG.L
Consumer Defensive
UD07.L
XDBG.L
Energy
UD07.L
XDBG.L
Basic Materials
UD07.L
XDBG.L
Real Estate
UD07.L
XDBG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UD07.L vs. XDBG.L — Risk / Return Rank
UD07.L
XDBG.L
UD07.L vs. XDBG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UD07.L) and Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged (XDBG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UD07.L | XDBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.46 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.37 | 4.83 | +0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.77 | 13.57 | +0.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UD07.L | XDBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 2.55 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.76 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.08 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
UD07.L vs. XDBG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UD07.L drawdown since its inception was -39.71%, smaller than the maximum XDBG.L drawdown of -64.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UD07.L and XDBG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UD07.L | XDBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.71% | -64.69% | +24.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.51% | -9.36% | +2.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.61% | -13.02% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.71% | -28.67% | -11.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.33% | -2.37% | -8.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.80% | -35.23% | +16.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 3.34% | -0.79% |
Volatility
UD07.L vs. XDBG.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UD07.L) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged (XDBG.L) at 4.29%. This indicates that UD07.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDBG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UD07.L | XDBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 4.29% | +0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.50% | 15.17% | -2.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.87% | 17.75% | -2.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.79% | 18.96% | +9.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.77% | 16.01% | +7.76% |
UD07.L vs. XDBG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UD07.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than XDBG.L's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
UD07.L vs. XDBG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither UD07.L nor XDBG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UD07.L and XDBG.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UD07.L is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UD07.L is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XDBG.L.
UD07.L tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity, while XDBG.L tracks Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward (GBP Hedged). They also come from different issuers: UBS and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for UD07.L and 0.39% for XDBG.L.
Find the right allocation for UD07.L and XDBG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer