PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UD07.L vs. XDBG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UD07.L vs. XDBG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UD07.L) and Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged (XDBG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UD07.L achieves a 21.43% return, which is significantly lower than XDBG.L's 23.55% return.


UD07.L

1D
0.85%
1M
1.49%
YTD
21.43%
6M
20.72%
1Y
35.14%
3Y*
12.39%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*

XDBG.L

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.86%
YTD
23.55%
6M
26.11%
1Y
45.42%
3Y*
19.29%
5Y*
14.47%
10Y*
8.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UD07.L vs. XDBG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UD07.L
UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
21.43%9.88%6.26%-10.97%32.08%31.93%-1.26%2.82%-2.04%
XDBG.L
Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged
23.55%25.68%8.15%-11.18%18.13%38.25%-3.17%5.10%-13.60%

Correlation

The correlation between UD07.L and XDBG.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2018

0.67

The correlation between UD07.L and XDBG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

UD07.L vs. XDBG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UD07.L
XDBG.L

Communication Services

55.9%
17.2%

Technology

16.1%
36.3%

Industrials

7.2%
10.6%

Financial Services

6.2%
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
4.9%

Healthcare

3.1%
4.0%

Utilities

2.2%
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

1.9%
11.8%

Energy

1.4%
3.1%

Basic Materials

0.7%
4.0%

Real Estate

0.1%
2.8%

Communication Services

UD07.L
55.9%
XDBG.L
17.2%

Technology

UD07.L
16.1%
XDBG.L
36.3%

Industrials

UD07.L
7.2%
XDBG.L
10.6%

Financial Services

UD07.L
6.2%
XDBG.L
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

UD07.L
5.2%
XDBG.L
4.9%

Healthcare

UD07.L
3.1%
XDBG.L
4.0%

Utilities

UD07.L
2.2%
XDBG.L
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

UD07.L
1.9%
XDBG.L
11.8%

Energy

UD07.L
1.4%
XDBG.L
3.1%

Basic Materials

UD07.L
0.7%
XDBG.L
4.0%

Real Estate

UD07.L
0.1%
XDBG.L
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UD07.L vs. XDBG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UD07.L
UD07.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
UD07.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UD07.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
UD07.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
UD07.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UD07.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

XDBG.L
XDBG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XDBG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDBG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDBG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
XDBG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDBG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UD07.L vs. XDBG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UD07.L) and Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged (XDBG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UD07.LXDBG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.46

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.37

4.83

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.77

13.57

+0.20

UD07.L vs. XDBG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UD07.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the XDBG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UD07.L and XDBG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UD07.LXDBG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.55

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.76

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.08

+0.34

Drawdowns

UD07.L vs. XDBG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UD07.L drawdown since its inception was -39.71%, smaller than the maximum XDBG.L drawdown of -64.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UD07.L and XDBG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UD07.LXDBG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.71%

-64.69%

+24.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.51%

-9.36%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.61%

-13.02%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.71%

-28.67%

-11.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.33%

-2.37%

-8.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.80%

-35.23%

+16.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

3.34%

-0.79%

Volatility

UD07.L vs. XDBG.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UD07.L) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 3C GBP Hedged (XDBG.L) at 4.29%. This indicates that UD07.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDBG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UD07.LXDBG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

4.29%

+0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.50%

15.17%

-2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.87%

17.75%

-2.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.79%

18.96%

+9.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.77%

16.01%

+7.76%

UD07.L vs. XDBG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UD07.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than XDBG.L's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

UD07.L vs. XDBG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither UD07.L nor XDBG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


UD07.L and XDBG.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UD07.L is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UD07.L is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XDBG.L.

UD07.L tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity, while XDBG.L tracks Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward (GBP Hedged). They also come from different issuers: UBS and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for UD07.L and 0.39% for XDBG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UD07.L and XDBG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer