UD03.L vs. LCPE.L
UD03.L (UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis) and LCPE.L (Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS) are both Europe Equities funds - UD03.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while LCPE.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UD03.L returned 10.72%/yr vs 9.64%/yr for LCPE.L. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UD03.L charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LCPE.L.
Performance
UD03.L vs. LCPE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UD03.L achieves a 12.28% return, which is significantly lower than LCPE.L's 14.20% return.
UD03.L
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 4.71%
- YTD
- 12.28%
- 6M
- 15.08%
- 1Y
- 24.17%
- 3Y*
- 14.83%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- —
LCPE.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 3.01%
- YTD
- 14.20%
- 6M
- 14.45%
- 1Y
- 27.63%
- 3Y*
- 11.83%
- 5Y*
- 9.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
UD03.L vs. LCPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UD03.L UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 12.28% | 25.20% | 0.78% | 19.24% | -4.62% | 10.81% | 5.72% | 0.00% |
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS | 14.20% | 18.88% | -2.83% | 10.70% | 0.29% | 16.28% | 8.38% | 2.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between UD03.L and LCPE.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2019 | 0.21 |
Over the past year, UD03.L and LCPE.L have become more correlated (0.44) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.
UD03.L vs. LCPE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UD03.L
LCPE.L
Financial Services
-
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
UD03.L
LCPE.L
-
Technology
UD03.L
LCPE.L
Consumer Defensive
UD03.L
LCPE.L
Industrials
UD03.L
LCPE.L
Utilities
UD03.L
LCPE.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
UD03.L
LCPE.L
Basic Materials
UD03.L
LCPE.L
Healthcare
UD03.L
LCPE.L
Communication Services
UD03.L
LCPE.L
Energy
UD03.L
LCPE.L
Real Estate
UD03.L
-
LCPE.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UD03.L vs. LCPE.L — Risk / Return Rank
UD03.L
LCPE.L
UD03.L vs. LCPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UD03.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.43 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.70 | 4.13 | +1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.25 | 13.66 | +2.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UD03.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.47 | 2.44 | +1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.75 | 1.04 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | 0.98 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
UD03.L vs. LCPE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UD03.L drawdown since its inception was -30.85%, which is greater than LCPE.L's maximum drawdown of -27.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UD03.L and LCPE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UD03.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.85% | -27.05% | -3.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.80% | -6.66% | -3.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.72% | -12.39% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.67% | -12.39% | -6.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | -2.71% | +1.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.31% | -3.52% | +0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 2.02% | +1.54% |
Volatility
UD03.L vs. LCPE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L) is 3.58%, while Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that UD03.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCPE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UD03.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 3.81% | -0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.13% | 11.29% | +4.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.46% | 17.74% | +9.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.29% | 20.60% | +26.69% |
UD03.L vs. LCPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UD03.L has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than LCPE.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
UD03.L vs. LCPE.L - Dividend Comparison
UD03.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, while LCPE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UD03.L UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 2.54% | 2.97% | 2.84% | 3.67% | 3.96% | 3.50% | 2.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UD03.L and LCPE.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UD03.L is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UD03.L is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.
UD03.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while LCPE.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for UD03.L and 0.65% for LCPE.L.
Find the right allocation for UD03.L and LCPE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer