UCYB vs. BEG

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

UCYB (ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity) and BEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. UCYB is passively managed, while BEG is actively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UCYB charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BEG.

Performance

UCYB vs. BEG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity (UCYB) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UCYB achieves a 27.14% return, which is significantly lower than BEG's 592.72% return.

UCYB

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -3.95%
• YTD: 27.14%
• 6M: 21.84%
• 1Y: 12.91%
• 3Y*: 36.10%
• 5Y*: 10.93%
• 10Y*: —

BEG

• 1D: -9.78%
• 1M: -4.77%
• YTD: 592.72%
• 6M: 513.01%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UCYB vs. BEG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UCYB ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity	27.14%	-3.53%
BEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF	592.72%	1.77%

Correlation

The correlation between UCYB and BEG is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025	0.10

Return for Risk

UCYB vs. BEG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UCYB

UCYB Risk / Return Rank: 13
UCYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
UCYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
UCYB Omega Ratio Rank: 14
UCYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
UCYB Martin Ratio Rank: 12

BEG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UCYB vs. BEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity (UCYB) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UCYB	BEG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.25	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.71	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.30	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.65	—	—

Drawdowns

UCYB vs. BEG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UCYB drawdown since its inception was -62.69%, roughly equal to the maximum BEG drawdown of -59.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCYB and BEG.

Drawdown Indicators

	UCYB	BEG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.69%	-59.85%	-2.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-43.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-62.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.60%	-21.19%	-1.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.38%	-16.74%	-10.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.92%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UCYB	BEG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.42%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.72%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.88%	211.95%	-161.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.24%	211.95%	-161.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.71%	211.95%	-162.24%

UCYB vs. BEG - Expense Ratio Comparison

UCYB has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than BEG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

UCYB vs. BEG - Dividend Comparison

UCYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, while BEG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UCYB ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity	1.82%	1.90%	2.16%	0.56%	0.00%	0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UCYB and BEG in my portfolio?

UCYB and BEG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UCYB or BEG?

On fees, BEG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UCYB or BEG?

BEG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for UCYB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UCYB or BEG?

UCYB has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.00% for BEG.

What is the main difference between UCYB and BEG?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for UCYB and 0.75% for BEG.