PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UCT2.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UCT2.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi US Curve Steepening 2-10Y UCITS ETF (Acc) (UCT2.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UCT2.DE achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than 6AQQ.DE's 19.67% return.


UCT2.DE

1D
0.09%
1M
1.35%
6M
0.94%
YTD
1.32%
1Y
2.32%
3Y*
1.50%
5Y*
0.25%
10Y*

6AQQ.DE

1D
0.44%
1M
-1.66%
6M
20.98%
YTD
19.67%
1Y
33.76%
3Y*
23.52%
5Y*
16.54%
10Y*
21.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UCT2.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UCT2.DE
Amundi US Curve Steepening 2-10Y UCITS ETF (Acc)
1.32%-8.99%10.12%-3.66%1.75%7.20%-9.05%-11.53%
6AQQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR
19.67%7.08%33.77%51.54%-29.96%39.62%34.72%11.56%

Correlation

The correlation between UCT2.DE and 6AQQ.DE is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2019

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UCT2.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UCT2.DE
UCT2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
UCT2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCT2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCT2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
UCT2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCT2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

6AQQ.DE
6AQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UCT2.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi US Curve Steepening 2-10Y UCITS ETF (Acc) (UCT2.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UCT2.DE6AQQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.35

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

3.36

-2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.35

9.73

-8.38

UCT2.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UCT2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the 6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UCT2.DE and 6AQQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UCT2.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UCT2.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.65%, smaller than the maximum 6AQQ.DE drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCT2.DE and 6AQQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UCT2.DE6AQQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.65%

-31.19%

+11.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.53%

-10.01%

+6.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.36%

-26.73%

+13.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.42%

-31.19%

+12.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.14%

-2.06%

-12.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.83%

-5.35%

-7.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

3.46%

-1.74%

Volatility

UCT2.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi US Curve Steepening 2-10Y UCITS ETF (Acc) (UCT2.DE) is 1.36%, while Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) has a volatility of 6.61%. This indicates that UCT2.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 6AQQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UCT2.DE6AQQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

6.61%

-5.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.46%

12.10%

-7.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.15%

16.70%

-10.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.44%

19.97%

-11.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.00%

19.69%

-10.69%

UCT2.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UCT2.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than 6AQQ.DE's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

UCT2.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither UCT2.DE nor 6AQQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


UCT2.DE and 6AQQ.DE have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 6AQQ.DE is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

6AQQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for UCT2.DE.

UCT2.DE is categorized as Macro Trading, while 6AQQ.DE is Nasdaq-100. UCT2.DE tracks Solactive USD Daily (x7) Steepener 2-10 Index, while 6AQQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for UCT2.DE and 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UCT2.DE and 6AQQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer