UCSH-U.TO vs. MNU-U.TO
UCSH-U.TO (Global X USD High Interest Savings ETF) and MNU-U.TO (Purpose USD Cash Management ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UCSH-U.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by Global X, while MNU-U.TO is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Purpose Investments. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, UCSH-U.TO returned 3.66% vs 3.84% for MNU-U.TO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UCSH-U.TO vs. MNU-U.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCSH-U.TO achieves a 1.76% return, which is significantly lower than MNU-U.TO's 1.97% return.
UCSH-U.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 3.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MNU-U.TO
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- 1.97%
- 1Y
- 3.84%
- 3Y*
- 4.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UCSH-U.TO vs. MNU-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
UCSH-U.TO Global X USD High Interest Savings ETF | 1.76% | 4.16% | 4.73% |
MNU-U.TO Purpose USD Cash Management ETF | 1.97% | 4.21% | 5.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between UCSH-U.TO and MNU-U.TO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2024 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UCSH-U.TO vs. MNU-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank
UCSH-U.TO
MNU-U.TO
UCSH-U.TO vs. MNU-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X USD High Interest Savings ETF (UCSH-U.TO) and Purpose USD Cash Management ETF (MNU-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UCSH-U.TO | MNU-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 12.24 | 16.98 | -4.75 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 91.84 | 44.87 | +46.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 635.32 | 431.36 | +203.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UCSH-U.TO vs. MNU-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCSH-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum MNU-U.TO drawdown of -0.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCSH-U.TO and MNU-U.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCSH-U.TO | MNU-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -0.43% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.04% | -0.09% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -0.01% | +0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% |
Volatility
UCSH-U.TO vs. MNU-U.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X USD High Interest Savings ETF (UCSH-U.TO) has a higher volatility of 0.08% compared to Purpose USD Cash Management ETF (MNU-U.TO) at 0.05%. This indicates that UCSH-U.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNU-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UCSH-U.TO | MNU-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.08% | 0.05% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.20% | 0.16% | +0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30% | 0.25% | +0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.31% | 0.49% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.31% | 0.49% | -0.18% |
Dividends
UCSH-U.TO vs. MNU-U.TO - Dividend Comparison
UCSH-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, less than MNU-U.TO's 3.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MNU-U.TO Purpose USD Cash Management ETF | 3.81% | 4.17% | 5.26% | 3.62% |
UCSH-U.TO Global X USD High Interest Savings ETF | 3.65% | 4.04% | 4.71% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UCSH-U.TO and MNU-U.TO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UCSH-U.TO is categorized as Money Market, while MNU-U.TO is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Purpose Investments.
Find the right allocation for UCSH-U.TO and MNU-U.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer