PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UCRP.L vs. FLOT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UCRP.L vs. FLOT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Index US Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C) (UCRP.L) and iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (FLOT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UCRP.L is traded in GBp, while FLOT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLOT.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UCRP.L achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly lower than FLOT.L's 2.35% return.


UCRP.L

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.67%
6M
-0.62%
YTD
-0.10%
1Y
4.59%
3Y*
3.87%
5Y*
0.66%
10Y*

FLOT.L

1D
0.43%
1M
0.04%
6M
1.45%
YTD
2.35%
1Y
4.30%
3Y*
4.56%
5Y*
4.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UCRP.L vs. FLOT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UCRP.L
Amundi Index US Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C)
-0.10%0.44%3.64%2.29%-5.01%-0.35%-19.86%14.52%1.28%
FLOT.L
iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.35%-2.30%8.24%0.74%13.98%1.55%-2.36%0.22%6.69%

Correlation

The correlation between UCRP.L and FLOT.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2018

0.47

The correlation between UCRP.L and FLOT.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.60 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UCRP.L vs. FLOT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UCRP.L
UCRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
UCRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
UCRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

FLOT.L
FLOT.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FLOT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UCRP.L vs. FLOT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index US Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C) (UCRP.L) and iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (FLOT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UCRP.LFLOT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.11

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

0.87

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.13

2.39

-0.26

UCRP.L vs. FLOT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UCRP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is comparable to the FLOT.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UCRP.L and FLOT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UCRP.L vs. FLOT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UCRP.L drawdown since its inception was -29.61%, which is greater than FLOT.L's maximum drawdown of -14.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCRP.L and FLOT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UCRP.LFLOT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.61%

-14.78%

-14.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.65%

-4.95%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

-9.46%

-10.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.13%

-14.78%

-5.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.08%

-2.96%

-18.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.66%

-5.87%

-12.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.79%

+0.22%

Volatility

UCRP.L vs. FLOT.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Index US Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C) (UCRP.L) and iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (FLOT.L) have volatilities of 2.02% and 2.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UCRP.LFLOT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

2.06%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.54%

5.08%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.13%

6.65%

-0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.59%

8.85%

+7.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.29%

9.09%

+7.20%

UCRP.L vs. FLOT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UCRP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than FLOT.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UCRP.L vs. FLOT.L - Dividend Comparison

UCRP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLOT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLOT.L
iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.68%5.02%6.05%5.50%1.45%0.60%1.59%2.91%2.21%0.46%
UCRP.L
Amundi Index US Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UCRP.L and FLOT.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLOT.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLOT.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for UCRP.L.

UCRP.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while FLOT.L is Ultra Short-Term Bonds. UCRP.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while FLOT.L tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note <5 Years Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for UCRP.L and 0.10% for FLOT.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UCRP.L and FLOT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer