UCRP.L vs. CSKR.L
UCRP.L (Amundi Index US Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C)) and CSKR.L (iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - UCRP.L is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while CSKR.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UCRP.L returned 1.54%/yr vs 19.76%/yr for CSKR.L. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. UCRP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CSKR.L.
Performance
UCRP.L vs. CSKR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UCRP.L is traded in GBp, while CSKR.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CSKR.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCRP.L achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than CSKR.L's 107.20% return.
UCRP.L
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 0.04%
- 1Y
- 6.13%
- 3Y*
- 2.39%
- 5Y*
- 1.54%
- 10Y*
- —
CSKR.L
- 1D
- -4.80%
- 1M
- 16.83%
- YTD
- 107.20%
- 6M
- 125.38%
- 1Y
- 235.82%
- 3Y*
- 45.39%
- 5Y*
- 19.76%
- 10Y*
- 17.87%
UCRP.L vs. CSKR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCRP.L Amundi Index US Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C) | 0.31% | 0.44% | 3.64% | 2.29% | -5.01% | -0.67% | 2.00% |
CSKR.L iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc) | 107.20% | 85.24% | -21.31% | 13.76% | -20.02% | -7.37% | 34.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between UCRP.L and CSKR.L is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2020 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UCRP.L vs. CSKR.L — Risk / Return Rank
UCRP.L
CSKR.L
UCRP.L vs. CSKR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index US Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C) (UCRP.L) and iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc) (CSKR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UCRP.L | CSKR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.83 | -0.65 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 10.81 | -9.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.14 | 38.46 | -35.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UCRP.L | CSKR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 6.19 | -5.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.73 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.65 | -0.61 |
Drawdowns
UCRP.L vs. CSKR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCRP.L drawdown since its inception was -16.01%, smaller than the maximum CSKR.L drawdown of -44.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCRP.L and CSKR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCRP.L | CSKR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.01% | -44.32% | +28.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.65% | -21.66% | +17.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.22% | -28.94% | +20.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.74% | -41.04% | +28.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.44% | -5.57% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.72% | -17.89% | +9.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 6.10% | -4.15% |
Volatility
UCRP.L vs. CSKR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Index US Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C) (UCRP.L) is 1.54%, while iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Acc) (CSKR.L) has a volatility of 17.72%. This indicates that UCRP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSKR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UCRP.L | CSKR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.54% | 17.72% | -16.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.50% | 33.18% | -28.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.03% | 37.90% | -31.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.76% | 27.66% | -18.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.78% | 28.22% | -18.44% |
UCRP.L vs. CSKR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UCRP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than CSKR.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
UCRP.L vs. CSKR.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither UCRP.L nor CSKR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UCRP.L and CSKR.L have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UCRP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UCRP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CSKR.L.
UCRP.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while CSKR.L is Asia Pacific Equities. UCRP.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while CSKR.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for UCRP.L and 0.65% for CSKR.L.
Find the right allocation for UCRP.L and CSKR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer