PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UCRP.L vs. 100D.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UCRP.L vs. 100D.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Index US Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C) (UCRP.L) and Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UCRP.L achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than 100D.L's 6.04% return.


UCRP.L

1D
0.25%
1M
1.37%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.04%
1Y
6.13%
3Y*
2.39%
5Y*
1.54%
10Y*

100D.L

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.44%
YTD
6.04%
6M
8.85%
1Y
21.22%
3Y*
14.75%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UCRP.L vs. 100D.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
UCRP.L
Amundi Index US Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C)
0.31%0.44%3.64%2.29%-5.01%-0.67%2.00%
100D.L
Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF
6.04%25.77%9.32%7.37%4.80%18.00%-9.80%

Correlation

The correlation between UCRP.L and 100D.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2020

-0.05

The correlation between UCRP.L and 100D.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (5 years) to 0.09 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UCRP.L vs. 100D.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UCRP.L
UCRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
UCRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
UCRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

100D.L
100D.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
100D.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
100D.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
100D.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
100D.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
100D.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UCRP.L vs. 100D.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index US Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C) (UCRP.L) and Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UCRP.L100D.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.36

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

2.38

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.14

8.06

-4.92

UCRP.L vs. 100D.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UCRP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the 100D.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UCRP.L and 100D.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UCRP.L100D.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

1.94

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.92

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.53

-0.48

Drawdowns

UCRP.L vs. 100D.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UCRP.L drawdown since its inception was -16.01%, smaller than the maximum 100D.L drawdown of -34.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCRP.L and 100D.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UCRP.L100D.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.01%

-34.63%

+18.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.65%

-8.92%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.22%

-13.06%

+4.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.74%

-13.06%

+0.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.44%

-4.00%

-1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.72%

-4.69%

-4.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.64%

-0.69%

Volatility

UCRP.L vs. 100D.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Index US Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C) (UCRP.L) is 1.54%, while Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that UCRP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 100D.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UCRP.L100D.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.54%

3.98%

-2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.50%

9.52%

-5.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.03%

10.96%

-4.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.76%

12.88%

-4.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.78%

15.92%

-6.14%

UCRP.L vs. 100D.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UCRP.L and 100D.L have an expense ratio of 0.14%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UCRP.L vs. 100D.L - Dividend Comparison

UCRP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 100D.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
100D.L
Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF
3.57%3.78%4.17%3.90%3.80%3.39%3.11%4.30%
UCRP.L
Amundi Index US Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UCRP.L and 100D.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.14% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UCRP.L and 100D.L have the same expense ratio: 0.14% per year.

UCRP.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while 100D.L is Europe Equities. UCRP.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while 100D.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UCRP.L and 100D.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer