UCRD vs. UITB
UCRD (VictoryShares ESG Corporate Bond ETF) and UITB (VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UCRD is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by Victory, while UITB is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Victory. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, UCRD returned 5.43%/yr vs 4.46%/yr for UITB. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. UCRD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for UITB.
Performance
UCRD vs. UITB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCRD achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly higher than UITB's 0.01% return.
UCRD
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- 6M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 0.19%
- 1Y
- 2.68%
- 3Y*
- 5.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.17%
UITB
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 1Y
- 2.23%
- 3Y*
- 4.46%
- 5Y*
- 0.15%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.23K | $3.75K | $2.97K | |
| $8.08M | $6.52M | $6.73M |
UCRD vs. UITB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCRD VictoryShares ESG Corporate Bond ETF | 0.19% | 7.90% | 2.68% | 9.27% | -17.13% | 0.32% |
UITB VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF | 0.01% | 7.32% | 1.81% | 6.49% | -12.23% | -0.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between UCRD and UITB is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2021 | 0.87 |
The correlation between UCRD and UITB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UCRD vs. UITB — Risk / Return Rank
UCRD
UITB
UCRD vs. UITB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares ESG Corporate Bond ETF (UCRD) and VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF (UITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UCRD | UITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.11 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 0.80 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.48 | 2.01 | +0.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UCRD vs. UITB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCRD drawdown since its inception was -22.37%, which is greater than UITB's maximum drawdown of -17.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCRD and UITB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCRD | UITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.37% | -17.02% | -5.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.90% | -2.80% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.54% | -4.75% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.44% | -1.77% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.16% | -4.29% | -3.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.08% | 1.11% | -0.03% |
Volatility
UCRD vs. UITB - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares ESG Corporate Bond ETF (UCRD) has a higher volatility of 1.30% compared to VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF (UITB) at 1.03%. This indicates that UCRD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UITB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UCRD | UITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.30% | 1.03% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.48% | 2.84% | +0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.25% | 3.51% | +0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.47% | 5.66% | +1.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.47% | 4.96% | +2.51% |
UCRD vs. UITB - Expense Ratio Comparison
UCRD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than UITB's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
UCRD vs. UITB - Dividend Comparison
UCRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, which matches UITB's 4.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCRD VictoryShares ESG Corporate Bond ETF | 4.26% | 4.05% | 4.00% | 3.56% | 2.72% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UITB VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF | 4.23% | 4.04% | 3.89% | 3.14% | 2.32% | 1.95% | 2.79% | 3.01% | 2.99% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, UCRD and UITB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
UCRD has higher volatility (1.30%) compared to UITB (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCRD dropped -22.37% vs UITB's -17.02%.
On 3-year performance, UCRD leads with 5.43% vs 4.46% for UITB. On fees, UITB is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, UITB has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, UCRD has performed better with a 5.43% return vs 4.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UITB is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for UCRD.
UCRD has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 4.23% for UITB.
UCRD is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while UITB is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for UCRD and 0.38% for UITB.
UITB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UCRD and UITB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer