PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UCRD vs. FLDR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UCRD vs. FLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares ESG Corporate Bond ETF (UCRD) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UCRD vs. FLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UCRD
VictoryShares ESG Corporate Bond ETF
-0.35%7.90%2.68%9.27%-17.13%0.30%
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
0.61%5.41%5.71%6.32%-0.33%-0.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UCRD achieves a -0.35% return, which is significantly lower than FLDR's 0.61% return.


UCRD

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.58%
YTD
-0.35%
6M
0.18%
1Y
4.80%
3Y*
5.06%
5Y*
10Y*

FLDR

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
0.61%
6M
1.75%
1Y
4.34%
3Y*
5.50%
5Y*
3.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UCRD vs. FLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison

UCRD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FLDR's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

UCRD vs. FLDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UCRD
UCRD Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
UCRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCRD Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
UCRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCRD Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FLDR
FLDR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UCRD vs. FLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares ESG Corporate Bond ETF (UCRD) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UCRDFLDRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

4.45

-3.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.30

6.66

-5.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

2.16

-0.99

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

5.87

-4.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.02

30.56

-25.54

UCRD vs. FLDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UCRD Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the FLDR Sharpe Ratio of 4.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UCRD and FLDR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UCRDFLDRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

4.45

-3.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.60

-0.59

Correlation

The correlation between UCRD and FLDR is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

UCRD vs. FLDR - Dividend Comparison

UCRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, less than FLDR's 4.55% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
UCRD
VictoryShares ESG Corporate Bond ETF
4.16%4.05%4.00%3.56%2.72%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
4.55%4.66%5.50%5.28%2.09%0.51%1.22%2.69%1.38%

Drawdowns

UCRD vs. FLDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UCRD drawdown since its inception was -22.37%, which is greater than FLDR's maximum drawdown of -12.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCRD and FLDR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UCRDFLDRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.37%

-12.23%

-10.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.17%

-0.76%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.98%

-0.19%

-1.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.68%

-0.36%

-8.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

0.15%

+0.86%

Volatility

UCRD vs. FLDR - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares ESG Corporate Bond ETF (UCRD) has a higher volatility of 2.13% compared to Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) at 0.42%. This indicates that UCRD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UCRDFLDRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.13%

0.42%

+1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.98%

0.57%

+2.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.16%

0.98%

+4.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.65%

1.21%

+6.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.65%

5.32%

+2.33%