UCG.MI vs. 1CS.MI
UCG.MI (UniCredit S.p.A.) and 1CS.MI (AXA SA) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — UCG.MI in Banks - Regional, 1CS.MI in Insurance - Diversified. Over the past 10 years, UCG.MI returned 33.60%/yr vs 13.16%/yr for 1CS.MI. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
UCG.MI vs. 1CS.MI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCG.MI achieves a 5.89% return, which is significantly higher than 1CS.MI's 0.98% return. Over the past 10 years, UCG.MI has outperformed 1CS.MI with an annualized return of 33.60%, while 1CS.MI has yielded a comparatively lower 13.16% annualized return.
UCG.MI
- 1D
- 4.10%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- YTD
- 5.89%
- 6M
- 11.29%
- 1Y
- 36.86%
- 3Y*
- 66.44%
- 5Y*
- 54.62%
- 10Y*
- 33.60%
1CS.MI
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- YTD
- 0.98%
- 6M
- 2.87%
- 1Y
- 0.18%
- 3Y*
- 19.78%
- 5Y*
- 18.23%
- 10Y*
- 13.16%
UCG.MI vs. 1CS.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCG.MI UniCredit S.p.A. | 5.89% | 94.09% | 69.10% | 95.01% | 3.82% | 79.52% | -41.24% | 34.49% | -35.37% | 126.88% |
1CS.MI AXA SA | 0.98% | 27.07% | 23.08% | 18.99% | 6.46% | 42.27% | -10.99% | 42.47% | -20.11% | 8.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between UCG.MI and 1CS.MI is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2006 | 0.61 |
The correlation between UCG.MI and 1CS.MI shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UCG.MI vs. 1CS.MI — Risk / Return Rank
UCG.MI
1CS.MI
UCG.MI vs. 1CS.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UniCredit S.p.A. (UCG.MI) and AXA SA (1CS.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UCG.MI | 1CS.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.01 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | -0.13 | +1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.03 | -0.23 | +4.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UCG.MI vs. 1CS.MI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCG.MI drawdown since its inception was -93.56%, which is greater than 1CS.MI's maximum drawdown of -81.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCG.MI and 1CS.MI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCG.MI | 1CS.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.56% | -81.45% | -12.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.17% | -13.46% | -10.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.17% | -13.46% | -10.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.40% | -24.58% | -21.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.16% | -51.02% | -14.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.50% | -3.74% | -0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.98% | -22.07% | -43.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.66% | 7.67% | +0.99% |
Volatility
UCG.MI vs. 1CS.MI - Volatility Comparison
UniCredit S.p.A. (UCG.MI) has a higher volatility of 8.15% compared to AXA SA (1CS.MI) at 5.71%. This indicates that UCG.MI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 1CS.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UCG.MI | 1CS.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.15% | 5.71% | +2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.82% | 18.95% | +5.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.19% | 25.17% | +6.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.81% | 24.02% | +11.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.06% | 27.28% | +20.78% |
Dividends
UCG.MI vs. 1CS.MI - Dividend Comparison
UCG.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than 1CS.MI's 5.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1CS.MI AXA SA | 5.91% | 5.22% | 5.80% | 5.77% | 5.85% | 5.43% | 10.97% | 5.32% | 6.72% | 4.68% | 4.60% | 3.74% |
UCG.MI UniCredit S.p.A. | 4.30% | 4.10% | 7.08% | 4.02% | 4.05% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 2.07% | 3.24% | 0.00% | 0.88% | 0.47% |
Financials
UCG.MI vs. 1CS.MI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UniCredit S.p.A. and AXA SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
UCG.MI and 1CS.MI have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for UCG.MI and 1CS.MI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer