UCEQX vs. GQFPX
UCEQX (USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund) and GQFPX (GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund) are both mutual funds - UCEQX is a Global Equities fund managed by Victory, while GQFPX is a Quality Factor fund managed by GQG Partners. Over the past 5 years, UCEQX returned 11.02%/yr vs 10.72%/yr for GQFPX. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. UCEQX charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for GQFPX.
Performance
UCEQX vs. GQFPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCEQX achieves a 14.16% return, which is significantly higher than GQFPX's 11.60% return.
UCEQX
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- 6M
- 10.61%
- YTD
- 14.16%
- 1Y
- 27.23%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 11.02%
- 10Y*
- 11.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.58%
GQFPX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 3.13%
- 6M
- 4.87%
- YTD
- 11.60%
- 1Y
- 18.02%
- 3Y*
- 13.78%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
UCEQX vs. GQFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCEQX USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund | 14.16% | 23.71% | 14.50% | 19.36% | -16.25% | 4.52% |
GQFPX GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund | 11.60% | 19.29% | 4.81% | 15.09% | -1.13% | 5.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between UCEQX and GQFPX is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between UCEQX and GQFPX has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UCEQX vs. GQFPX — Risk / Return Rank
UCEQX
GQFPX
UCEQX vs. GQFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UCEQX | GQFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.30 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 2.80 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.09 | 7.14 | +4.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UCEQX vs. GQFPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCEQX drawdown since its inception was -35.33%, which is greater than GQFPX's maximum drawdown of -16.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCEQX and GQFPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCEQX | GQFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.33% | -16.95% | -18.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.96% | -6.28% | -2.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.64% | -10.57% | -5.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.24% | -16.95% | -8.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -1.46% | +1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.83% | -3.03% | -1.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.08% | 2.45% | -0.37% |
Volatility
UCEQX vs. GQFPX - Volatility Comparison
USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) have volatilities of 3.40% and 3.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UCEQX | GQFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 3.28% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.02% | 8.32% | +2.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.32% | 10.18% | +3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 12.78% | +2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 12.81% | +3.65% |
UCEQX vs. GQFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UCEQX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GQFPX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
UCEQX vs. GQFPX - Dividend Comparison
UCEQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, less than GQFPX's 5.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQFPX GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund | 5.52% | 5.32% | 3.71% | 3.69% | 5.18% | 1.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UCEQX USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund | 4.45% | 5.08% | 2.56% | 5.10% | 6.80% | 4.61% | 8.25% | 4.79% | 6.73% | 1.91% | 3.16% | 3.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UCEQX and GQFPX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UCEQX has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to GQFPX (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCEQX dropped -35.33% vs GQFPX's -16.95%.
UCEQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UCEQX and GQFPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer