PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UCBJY vs. BYRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UCBJY vs. BYRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UCB SA ADR (UCBJY) and Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UCBJY achieves a -2.83% return, which is significantly higher than BYRN's -81.06% return. Over the past 10 years, UCBJY has outperformed BYRN with an annualized return of 14.80%, while BYRN has yielded a comparatively lower 2.85% annualized return.


UCBJY

1D
-1.25%
1M
-5.72%
6M
-11.64%
YTD
-2.83%
1Y
34.06%
3Y*
44.86%
5Y*
21.52%
10Y*
14.80%
ALL TIME*
14.85%

BYRN

1D
-4.79%
1M
-46.10%
6M
-81.13%
YTD
-81.06%
1Y
-85.37%
3Y*
-7.28%
5Y*
-33.16%
10Y*
2.85%
ALL TIME*
1.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UCBJY vs. BYRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UCBJY
UCB SA ADR
-2.83%42.69%129.19%12.67%-30.04%6.90%34.46%-1.59%9.33%21.37%
BYRN
Byrna Technologies Inc.
-81.06%-41.72%350.86%-18.49%-41.27%-7.93%663.16%26.67%7.14%-30.00%

Correlation

The correlation between UCBJY and BYRN is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2011

0.06

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UCBJY:

$51.37B

BYRN:

$72.16M

EPS

UCBJY:

€6.73

BYRN:

-$0.16

PS Ratio

UCBJY:

3.31

BYRN:

0.69

PB Ratio

UCBJY:

4.22

BYRN:

1.27

Total Revenue (TTM)

UCBJY:

€13.86B

BYRN:

$108.86M

Gross Profit (TTM)

UCBJY:

€10.00B

BYRN:

$57.17M

EBITDA (TTM)

UCBJY:

€4.56B

BYRN:

-$3.55M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UCBJY vs. BYRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UCBJY
UCBJY Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
UCBJY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCBJY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCBJY Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
UCBJY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCBJY Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

BYRN
BYRN Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BYRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYRN Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BYRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYRN Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UCBJY vs. BYRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UCB SA ADR (UCBJY) and Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UCBJYBYRNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

0.68

+0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

-0.97

+2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.44

-1.61

+5.05

UCBJY vs. BYRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UCBJY Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the BYRN Sharpe Ratio of -1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UCBJY and BYRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UCBJY vs. BYRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UCBJY drawdown since its inception was -50.32%, smaller than the maximum BYRN drawdown of -92.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCBJY and BYRN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UCBJYBYRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.32%

-92.51%

+42.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.77%

-88.49%

+66.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.58%

-90.70%

+62.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.82%

-92.51%

+45.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.32%

-92.51%

+42.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.26%

-90.70%

+71.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.15%

-52.56%

+39.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.92%

52.97%

-43.05%

Volatility

UCBJY vs. BYRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UCB SA ADR (UCBJY) is 9.05%, while Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) has a volatility of 46.03%. This indicates that UCBJY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BYRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UCBJYBYRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.05%

46.03%

-36.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.67%

74.23%

-49.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.68%

79.65%

-43.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.38%

75.01%

-44.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.70%

96.25%

-65.55%

Dividends

UCBJY vs. BYRN - Dividend Comparison

UCBJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, while BYRN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BYRN
Byrna Technologies Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UCBJY
UCB SA ADR
0.63%0.57%0.73%1.67%1.79%0.86%0.78%1.06%1.10%2.71%3.21%

Financials

UCBJY vs. BYRN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UCB SA ADR and Byrna Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
4.22B
16.39M
(UCBJY) Total Revenue
(BYRN) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. UCBJY values in EUR, BYRN values in USD

UCBJY vs. BYRN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between UCB SA ADR and Byrna Technologies Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
71.9%
10.9%
Portfolio components
UCBJY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, UCB SA ADR reported a gross profit of 3.04B and revenue of 4.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.9%.

BYRN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.78M and revenue of 16.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.9%.

UCBJY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, UCB SA ADR reported an operating income of 1.28B and revenue of 4.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.3%.

BYRN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of -12.85M and revenue of 16.39M, resulting in an operating margin of -78.4%.

UCBJY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, UCB SA ADR reported a net income of 1.07B and revenue of 4.22B, resulting in a net margin of 25.5%.

BYRN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported a net income of -10.09M and revenue of 16.39M, resulting in a net margin of -61.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UCBJY and BYRN have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BYRN has higher volatility (46.03%) compared to UCBJY (9.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCBJY dropped -50.32% vs BYRN's -92.51%.

UCBJY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UCBJY and BYRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer