UC99.L vs. XMVU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UC99.L (UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and XMVU.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from UBS and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UC99.L returned 13.98%/yr vs 8.39%/yr for XMVU.L. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UC99.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XMVU.L.

Performance

UC99.L vs. XMVU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

UC99.L is traded in GBp, while XMVU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XMVU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC99.L achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly higher than XMVU.L's 2.55% return.

UC99.L

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 6.73%
• YTD: 10.42%
• 6M: 10.82%
• 1Y: 29.48%
• 3Y*: 17.61%
• 5Y*: 13.98%
• 10Y*: 16.19%

XMVU.L

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 3.21%
• YTD: 2.55%
• 6M: 2.11%
• 1Y: 5.35%
• 3Y*: 8.76%
• 5Y*: 8.39%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC99.L vs. XMVU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UC99.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	10.42%	8.68%	22.60%	27.58%	-15.03%	28.64%	16.43%	32.55%	0.49%	12.84%
XMVU.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D	2.55%	0.25%	17.70%	4.30%	1.22%	22.78%	1.32%	20.17%	4.68%	8.23%

Correlation

The correlation between UC99.L and XMVU.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2016	0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between UC99.L and XMVU.L has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

UC99.L vs. XMVU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UC99.L	XMVU.L
Technology	54.7%	29.6%
Industrials	13.3%	6.2%
Healthcare	10.9%	12.7%
Communication Services	7.9%	6.0%
Financial Services	7.3%	13.7%
Consumer Cyclical	2.9%	6.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	10.0%
Utilities	0.1%	7.6%
Basic Materials	0.0%	2.2%
Energy	-	3.5%
Real Estate	-	2.2%

Return for Risk

UC99.L vs. XMVU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC99.L

UC99.L Risk / Return Rank: 70
UC99.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
UC99.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
UC99.L Omega Ratio Rank: 74
UC99.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
UC99.L Martin Ratio Rank: 62

XMVU.L

XMVU.L Risk / Return Rank: 19
XMVU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
XMVU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
XMVU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 17
XMVU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
XMVU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC99.L vs. XMVU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UC99.L	XMVU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	0.56	+1.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.35	0.85	+2.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.10	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.10	1.05	+2.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.14	2.53	+8.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UC99.L vs. XMVU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC99.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the XMVU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC99.L and XMVU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UC99.L	XMVU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.41	0.56	+1.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87	0.69	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.98	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.00	0.65	+0.35

Drawdowns

UC99.L vs. XMVU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC99.L drawdown since its inception was -23.20%, smaller than the maximum XMVU.L drawdown of -24.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC99.L and XMVU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	UC99.L	XMVU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.20%	-24.94%	+1.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.47%	-5.07%	-4.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.20%	-11.48%	-11.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.20%	-11.48%	-11.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.86%	+2.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.24%	-4.01%	-0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	2.11%	+0.53%

Volatility

UC99.L vs. XMVU.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D (XMVU.L) have volatilities of 3.33% and 3.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UC99.L	XMVU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.33%	3.31%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.62%	7.14%	+1.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.19%	9.47%	+2.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.02%	12.13%	+3.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.54%	13.83%	+2.71%

UC99.L vs. XMVU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC99.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XMVU.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

UC99.L vs. XMVU.L - Dividend Comparison

UC99.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XMVU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
UC99.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%
XMVU.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1D	1.18%	1.24%	1.31%	1.33%	1.82%	1.27%	1.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UC99.L and XMVU.L in my portfolio?

UC99.L and XMVU.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UC99.L or XMVU.L?

On fees, XMVU.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UC99.L or XMVU.L?

XMVU.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for UC99.L.

What is the main difference between UC99.L and XMVU.L?

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for UC99.L and 0.20% for XMVU.L.