UC99.L vs. AUAD.L
UC99.L (UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and AUAD.L (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis) are both exchange-traded funds - UC99.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while AUAD.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Australia NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UC99.L returned 13.98%/yr vs 6.87%/yr for AUAD.L. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UC99.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for AUAD.L.
Performance
UC99.L vs. AUAD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with UC99.L having a 10.42% return and AUAD.L slightly lower at 10.41%.
UC99.L
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 6.73%
- YTD
- 10.42%
- 6M
- 10.82%
- 1Y
- 29.48%
- 3Y*
- 17.61%
- 5Y*
- 13.98%
- 10Y*
- 16.19%
AUAD.L
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 10.41%
- 6M
- 11.49%
- 1Y
- 15.16%
- 3Y*
- 9.79%
- 5Y*
- 6.87%
- 10Y*
- —
UC99.L vs. AUAD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UC99.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 10.42% | 8.68% | 22.60% | 27.58% | -15.03% | 28.64% | 26.99% |
AUAD.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis | 10.41% | 6.19% | 3.38% | 7.37% | 5.97% | 8.63% | 40.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between UC99.L and AUAD.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2020 | 0.41 |
UC99.L vs. AUAD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UC99.L
AUAD.L
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
UC99.L
AUAD.L
Industrials
UC99.L
AUAD.L
Healthcare
UC99.L
AUAD.L
Communication Services
UC99.L
AUAD.L
Financial Services
UC99.L
AUAD.L
Consumer Cyclical
UC99.L
AUAD.L
Consumer Defensive
UC99.L
AUAD.L
Utilities
UC99.L
AUAD.L
Basic Materials
UC99.L
AUAD.L
Energy
UC99.L
-
AUAD.L
Real Estate
UC99.L
-
AUAD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UC99.L vs. AUAD.L — Risk / Return Rank
UC99.L
AUAD.L
UC99.L vs. AUAD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis (AUAD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UC99.L | AUAD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.21 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 1.83 | +1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.14 | 4.87 | +6.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UC99.L | AUAD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 1.17 | +1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.47 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.00 | 0.97 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
UC99.L vs. AUAD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UC99.L drawdown since its inception was -23.20%, which is greater than AUAD.L's maximum drawdown of -21.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC99.L and AUAD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UC99.L | AUAD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.20% | -21.75% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.47% | -8.32% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.20% | -21.75% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.20% | -21.75% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.35% | +3.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.24% | -5.07% | +0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 3.12% | -0.48% |
Volatility
UC99.L vs. AUAD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L) is 3.33%, while UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis (AUAD.L) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that UC99.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUAD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UC99.L | AUAD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 4.54% | -1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.62% | 10.32% | -1.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.19% | 13.01% | -0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.02% | 16.83% | -0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 18.33% | -1.79% |
UC99.L vs. AUAD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UC99.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than AUAD.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
UC99.L vs. AUAD.L - Dividend Comparison
UC99.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AUAD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUAD.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis | 2.91% | 3.22% | 3.57% | 4.16% | 3.95% | 2.50% | 3.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UC99.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UC99.L and AUAD.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UC99.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UC99.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for AUAD.L.
UC99.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while AUAD.L is Asia Pacific Equities. UC99.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while AUAD.L tracks MSCI Australia NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for UC99.L and 0.40% for AUAD.L.
Find the right allocation for UC99.L and AUAD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer