UC96.L vs. UC55.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UC96.L (UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and UC55.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both exchange-traded funds - UC96.L is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while UC55.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UC96.L returned 10.91%/yr vs 13.61%/yr for UC55.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UC96.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for UC55.L.

Performance

UC96.L vs. UC55.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC55.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC96.L achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly lower than UC55.L's 9.94% return. Over the past 10 years, UC96.L has underperformed UC55.L with an annualized return of 10.91%, while UC55.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.61% annualized return.

UC96.L

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 4.51%
• YTD: 6.54%
• 6M: 6.76%
• 1Y: 19.26%
• 3Y*: 9.16%
• 5Y*: 8.01%
• 10Y*: 10.91%

UC55.L

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 5.08%
• YTD: 9.94%
• 6M: 10.25%
• 1Y: 26.92%
• 3Y*: 17.39%
• 5Y*: 12.77%
• 10Y*: 13.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC96.L vs. UC55.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UC96.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	6.54%	3.55%	8.94%	8.61%	1.61%	29.15%	1.32%	19.93%	-2.52%	7.87%
UC55.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	9.94%	12.47%	20.76%	17.25%	-8.62%	23.36%	11.95%	22.81%	-4.07%	11.64%

Correlation

The correlation between UC96.L and UC55.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015	0.84

The correlation between UC96.L and UC55.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UC96.L vs. UC55.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UC96.L	UC55.L
Technology	21.1%	30.2%
Industrials	19.5%	10.9%
Healthcare	19.0%	8.6%
Financial Services	18.7%	15.4%
Basic Materials	5.7%	3.2%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	5.1%
Communication Services	4.3%	9.1%
Consumer Cyclical	4.0%	9.1%
Energy	1.9%	4.1%
Utilities	0.5%	2.5%
Real Estate	-	1.8%

Return for Risk

UC96.L vs. UC55.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC96.L

UC96.L Risk / Return Rank: 54
UC96.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
UC96.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
UC96.L Omega Ratio Rank: 51
UC96.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
UC96.L Martin Ratio Rank: 53

UC55.L

UC55.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
UC55.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
UC55.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
UC55.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
UC55.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
UC55.L Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC96.L vs. UC55.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC55.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UC96.L	UC55.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	2.67	-0.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	3.66	-1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.51	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.79	4.04	-1.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.08	16.01	-6.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UC96.L vs. UC55.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC96.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is lower than the UC55.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC96.L and UC55.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UC96.L	UC55.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.80	2.67	-0.87
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	0.96	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	0.92	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.83	-0.10

Drawdowns

UC96.L vs. UC55.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC96.L drawdown since its inception was -27.20%, roughly equal to the maximum UC55.L drawdown of -28.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC96.L and UC55.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	UC96.L	UC55.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.20%	-28.07%	+0.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.87%	-6.63%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.43%	-18.92%	-0.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.43%	-18.92%	-0.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.20%	-28.07%	+0.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.16%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.30%	-3.35%	-0.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.12%	1.68%	+0.44%

Volatility

UC96.L vs. UC55.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L) has a higher volatility of 2.93% compared to UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC55.L) at 2.50%. This indicates that UC96.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC55.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UC96.L	UC55.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.93%	2.50%	+0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.52%	7.22%	+0.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.64%	10.02%	+0.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.04%	13.29%	+0.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.94%	14.85%	+1.09%

UC96.L vs. UC55.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC96.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than UC55.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

UC96.L vs. UC55.L - Dividend Comparison

UC96.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than UC55.L's 0.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UC55.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	0.90%	1.02%	1.10%	1.30%	1.38%	1.01%	1.28%	1.66%	1.66%	1.70%	1.72%	1.86%
UC96.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.78%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.01%	0.02%	0.02%	0.01%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UC96.L and UC55.L in my portfolio?

UC96.L and UC55.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UC96.L or UC55.L?

On fees, UC96.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UC96.L or UC55.L?

UC96.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for UC55.L.

What is the main difference between UC96.L and UC55.L?

UC96.L is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while UC55.L is Global Equities. UC96.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while UC55.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for UC96.L and 0.30% for UC55.L.