UC96.L vs. TDIV.L
UC96.L (UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and TDIV.L (VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - UC96.L is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while TDIV.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UC96.L returned 11.23%/yr vs 13.52%/yr for TDIV.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UC96.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for TDIV.L.
Performance
UC96.L vs. TDIV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UC96.L is traded in GBp, while TDIV.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TDIV.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UC96.L achieves a 7.45% return, which is significantly lower than TDIV.L's 12.00% return. Over the past 10 years, UC96.L has underperformed TDIV.L with an annualized return of 11.23%, while TDIV.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.52% annualized return.
UC96.L
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- 6M
- 4.08%
- YTD
- 7.45%
- 1Y
- 16.72%
- 3Y*
- 10.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.14%
- 10Y*
- 11.23%
TDIV.L
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- 6M
- 9.89%
- YTD
- 12.00%
- 1Y
- 29.46%
- 3Y*
- 21.07%
- 5Y*
- 18.35%
- 10Y*
- 13.52%
UC96.L vs. TDIV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UC96.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 7.45% | 4.85% | 9.71% | 9.45% | 3.22% | 31.64% | 3.36% | 21.68% | -0.82% | 9.73% |
TDIV.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 12.00% | 30.40% | 10.83% | 9.67% | 22.28% | 19.26% | -5.17% | 31.81% | -1.23% | -5.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between UC96.L and TDIV.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2016 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between UC96.L and TDIV.L has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UC96.L vs. TDIV.L — Risk / Return Rank
UC96.L
TDIV.L
UC96.L vs. TDIV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TDIV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UC96.L | TDIV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.52 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 5.97 | -3.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.81 | 20.13 | -12.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UC96.L vs. TDIV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UC96.L drawdown since its inception was -26.78%, smaller than the maximum TDIV.L drawdown of -29.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC96.L and TDIV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UC96.L | TDIV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.78% | -29.96% | +3.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.87% | -4.91% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.90% | -12.69% | -6.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.90% | -12.69% | -6.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.78% | -29.96% | +3.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.26% | 0.00% | -3.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.97% | -4.47% | +0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 1.46% | +0.68% |
Volatility
UC96.L vs. TDIV.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L) has a higher volatility of 3.52% compared to VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TDIV.L) at 3.08%. This indicates that UC96.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDIV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UC96.L | TDIV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.52% | 3.08% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.91% | 8.41% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.69% | 10.55% | +0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.04% | 12.91% | +1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.71% | 15.94% | -0.23% |
UC96.L vs. TDIV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UC96.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than TDIV.L's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
UC96.L vs. TDIV.L - Dividend Comparison
UC96.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than TDIV.L's 3.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDIV.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 3.10% | 3.49% | 4.36% | 4.82% | 4.49% | 4.14% | 3.88% | 4.37% | 5.77% | 4.50% | 0.00% |
UC96.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 1.15% | 1.21% | 0.69% | 1.53% | 1.53% | 1.62% | 1.84% | 1.39% | 1.86% | 1.58% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UC96.L and TDIV.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UC96.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UC96.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDIV.L.
UC96.L is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while TDIV.L is Global Equities. UC96.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while TDIV.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for UC96.L and 0.38% for TDIV.L.
Find the right allocation for UC96.L and TDIV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer