UC96.L vs. SEMC.L

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

UC96.L (UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and SEMC.L (UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both exchange-traded funds - UC96.L is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while SEMC.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UC96.L returned 9.88%/yr vs 4.07%/yr for SEMC.L. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UC96.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for SEMC.L.

Performance

UC96.L vs. SEMC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SEMC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC96.L achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly higher than SEMC.L's 3.69% return.

UC96.L

• 1D: 1.40%
• 1M: 3.96%
• YTD: 9.96%
• 6M: 10.45%
• 1Y: 23.09%
• 3Y*: 11.72%
• 5Y*: 9.88%
• 10Y*: 12.43%

SEMC.L

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 1.69%
• YTD: 3.69%
• 6M: 4.35%
• 1Y: 10.58%
• 3Y*: 6.77%
• 5Y*: 4.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC96.L vs. SEMC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UC96.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	9.96%	4.85%	9.71%	9.45%	3.22%	31.64%	3.36%	21.68%	-0.82%	4.27%
SEMC.L UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	3.69%	2.50%	9.09%	2.06%	0.59%	1.54%	-0.46%	4.45%	5.08%	-2.48%

Correlation

The correlation between UC96.L and SEMC.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2017	0.31

Return for Risk

UC96.L vs. SEMC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC96.L

UC96.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
UC96.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
UC96.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
UC96.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
UC96.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
UC96.L Martin Ratio Rank: 67

SEMC.L

SEMC.L Risk / Return Rank: 57
SEMC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
SEMC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
SEMC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 53
SEMC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
SEMC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC96.L vs. SEMC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SEMC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UC96.L	SEMC.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	1.65	+0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.03	2.51	+0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.30	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	2.81	+0.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.86	8.27	+2.59

UC96.L vs. SEMC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC96.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the SEMC.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC96.L and SEMC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UC96.L vs. SEMC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC96.L drawdown since its inception was -26.78%, which is greater than SEMC.L's maximum drawdown of -12.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC96.L and SEMC.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	UC96.L	SEMC.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.78%	-12.52%	-14.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.87%	-3.43%	-3.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.90%	-7.69%	-11.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.90%	-11.90%	-7.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.34%	+0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.99%	-4.96%	+0.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	1.16%	+0.93%

Volatility

UC96.L vs. SEMC.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L) has a higher volatility of 2.63% compared to UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SEMC.L) at 1.57%. This indicates that UC96.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEMC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UC96.L	SEMC.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.63%	1.57%	+1.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.61%	4.21%	+3.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.69%	5.84%	+4.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.03%	7.60%	+6.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.72%	8.16%	+7.56%

UC96.L vs. SEMC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC96.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SEMC.L's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

UC96.L vs. SEMC.L - Dividend Comparison

UC96.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than SEMC.L's 5.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
SEMC.L UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	5.70%	6.51%	5.01%	5.04%	3.98%	3.97%	4.77%	5.18%	1.98%	0.00%	0.00%
UC96.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	1.12%	1.21%	0.69%	1.53%	1.53%	1.62%	1.84%	1.39%	1.86%	1.58%	1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UC96.L and SEMC.L in my portfolio?

UC96.L and SEMC.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UC96.L or SEMC.L?

On fees, UC96.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UC96.L or SEMC.L?

UC96.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for SEMC.L.

What is the main difference between UC96.L and SEMC.L?

UC96.L is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SEMC.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. UC96.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while SEMC.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for UC96.L and 0.42% for SEMC.L.