UC96.L vs. S5SD.L
UC96.L (UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and S5SD.L (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis) are both exchange-traded funds - UC96.L is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while S5SD.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, UC96.L returned 19.26% vs 30.12% for S5SD.L. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UC96.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for S5SD.L.
Performance
UC96.L vs. S5SD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UC96.L achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly lower than S5SD.L's 9.02% return.
UC96.L
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 6.54%
- 6M
- 6.76%
- 1Y
- 19.26%
- 3Y*
- 9.16%
- 5Y*
- 8.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
S5SD.L
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 9.02%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- 1Y
- 30.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UC96.L vs. S5SD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UC96.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 6.54% | 16.88% |
S5SD.L UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis | 9.02% | 27.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between UC96.L and S5SD.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.65 |
The correlation between UC96.L and S5SD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
UC96.L vs. S5SD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UC96.L
S5SD.L
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
UC96.L
S5SD.L
Industrials
UC96.L
S5SD.L
Healthcare
UC96.L
S5SD.L
Financial Services
UC96.L
S5SD.L
Basic Materials
UC96.L
S5SD.L
Consumer Defensive
UC96.L
S5SD.L
Communication Services
UC96.L
S5SD.L
Consumer Cyclical
UC96.L
S5SD.L
Energy
UC96.L
S5SD.L
Utilities
UC96.L
S5SD.L
Real Estate
UC96.L
-
S5SD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UC96.L vs. S5SD.L — Risk / Return Rank
UC96.L
S5SD.L
UC96.L vs. S5SD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UC96.L | S5SD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.54 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 4.13 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.08 | 15.94 | -6.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UC96.L | S5SD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 2.89 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 3.09 | -2.36 |
Drawdowns
UC96.L vs. S5SD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UC96.L drawdown since its inception was -27.20%, which is greater than S5SD.L's maximum drawdown of -7.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC96.L and S5SD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UC96.L | S5SD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.20% | -7.32% | -19.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.87% | -7.32% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.44% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.30% | -1.26% | -3.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 1.90% | +0.22% |
Volatility
UC96.L vs. S5SD.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L) have volatilities of 2.93% and 2.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UC96.L | S5SD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.93% | 2.81% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.52% | 7.10% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.64% | 10.53% | +0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.04% | 11.47% | +2.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 11.47% | +4.47% |
UC96.L vs. S5SD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UC96.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than S5SD.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UC96.L vs. S5SD.L - Dividend Comparison
UC96.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while S5SD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S5SD.L UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UC96.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.78% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UC96.L and S5SD.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, S5SD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
S5SD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for UC96.L.
UC96.L is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while S5SD.L is S&P 500. UC96.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while S5SD.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for UC96.L and 0.12% for S5SD.L.
Find the right allocation for UC96.L and S5SD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer