PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UC95.L vs. FLXK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UC95.L vs. FLXK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC95.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLXK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UC95.L is traded in GBp, while FLXK.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLXK.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC95.L achieves a 5.16% return, which is significantly lower than FLXK.L's 75.44% return.


UC95.L

1D
1.31%
1M
2.32%
6M
3.07%
YTD
5.16%
1Y
7.11%
3Y*
8.48%
5Y*
7.02%
10Y*
9.19%

FLXK.L

1D
-2.27%
1M
-18.90%
6M
51.85%
YTD
75.44%
1Y
141.17%
3Y*
38.05%
5Y*
16.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC95.L vs. FLXK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UC95.L
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
5.16%-0.82%15.46%0.41%4.20%26.08%0.69%7.34%
FLXK.L
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
75.44%80.91%-20.26%14.73%-19.45%-5.96%42.98%8.49%

Correlation

The correlation between UC95.L and FLXK.L is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019

0.21

The correlation between UC95.L and FLXK.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UC95.L vs. FLXK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC95.L
UC95.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
UC95.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC95.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC95.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
UC95.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC95.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

FLXK.L
FLXK.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FLXK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC95.L vs. FLXK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC95.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLXK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UC95.LFLXK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.47

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

5.48

-4.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.02

18.23

-16.22

UC95.L vs. FLXK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC95.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the FLXK.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC95.L and FLXK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UC95.L vs. FLXK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC95.L drawdown since its inception was -28.11%, smaller than the maximum FLXK.L drawdown of -41.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC95.L and FLXK.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UC95.LFLXK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.11%

-41.70%

+13.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-25.59%

+16.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.14%

-28.10%

+17.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.32%

-37.51%

+26.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.45%

-25.59%

+23.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-17.71%

+13.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

7.71%

-4.19%

Volatility

UC95.L vs. FLXK.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC95.L) is 3.91%, while Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLXK.L) has a volatility of 19.61%. This indicates that UC95.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UC95.LFLXK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

19.61%

-15.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.22%

40.36%

-32.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.48%

43.90%

-33.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.02%

27.96%

-15.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.71%

28.13%

-14.42%

UC95.L vs. FLXK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC95.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXK.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UC95.L vs. FLXK.L - Dividend Comparison

UC95.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, while FLXK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLXK.L
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UC95.L
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.79%1.99%1.61%1.53%1.29%1.13%2.06%2.11%1.91%1.68%1.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


UC95.L and FLXK.L have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLXK.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLXK.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for UC95.L.

UC95.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FLXK.L is South Korea Equities. UC95.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while FLXK.L tracks FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped Index (Net Return). They also come from different issuers: UBS and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for UC95.L and 0.09% for FLXK.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UC95.L and FLXK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer