UC95.L vs. XZMD.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC95.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XZMD.L).

UC95.L and XZMD.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UC95.L is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Aug 26, 2015. XZMD.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Apr 20, 2022. Both UC95.L and XZMD.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

UC95.L vs. XZMD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC95.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XZMD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

UC95.L vs. XZMD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
UC95.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	2.23%	-0.82%	15.46%	0.42%	3.19%
XZMD.L Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D	-5.14%	8.37%	27.57%	23.85%	-5.73%

Different Trading Currencies

UC95.L is traded in GBp, while XZMD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XZMD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC95.L achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly higher than XZMD.L's -5.14% return.

UC95.L

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -5.17%
• YTD: 2.23%
• 6M: 1.79%
• 1Y: -2.44%
• 3Y*: 6.67%
• 5Y*: 8.16%
• 10Y*: 10.16%

XZMD.L

• 1D: 2.63%
• 1M: -3.18%
• YTD: -5.14%
• 6M: 1.73%
• 1Y: 17.29%
• 3Y*: 16.40%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC95.L vs. XZMD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC95.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XZMD.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

UC95.L

UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis

XZMD.L

Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D

Return for Risk

UC95.L vs. XZMD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC95.L

UC95.L Risk / Return Rank: 7
UC95.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
UC95.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
UC95.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7
UC95.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
UC95.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7

XZMD.L

XZMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 71
XZMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
XZMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
XZMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
XZMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
XZMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC95.L vs. XZMD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC95.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XZMD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UC95.L	XZMD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.20	1.70	-1.91
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.20	2.54	-2.74
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.32	-0.34
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.34	0.95	-1.29
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.67	2.81	-3.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UC95.L vs. XZMD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC95.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the XZMD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC95.L and XZMD.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UC95.L	XZMD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20	1.70	-1.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	1.05	-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between UC95.L and XZMD.L is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

UC95.L vs. XZMD.L - Dividend Comparison

UC95.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, more than XZMD.L's 0.76% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
UC95.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	1.84%	1.99%	1.61%	1.54%	1.29%	1.13%	1.79%	1.66%	1.64%	1.68%	1.37%
XZMD.L Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D	0.76%	0.79%	0.95%	0.95%	0.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

UC95.L vs. XZMD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC95.L drawdown since its inception was -28.11%, which is greater than XZMD.L's maximum drawdown of -22.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC95.L and XZMD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	UC95.L	XZMD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.11%	-20.62%	-7.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.07%	-11.61%	+3.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.32%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.17%	-8.24%	+3.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.07%	-5.05%	+0.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.39%	5.60%	-2.21%

Volatility

UC95.L vs. XZMD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC95.L) is 3.27%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XZMD.L) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that UC95.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XZMD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UC95.L	XZMD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.27%	5.26%	-1.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.09%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.95%	23.47%	-11.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.88%	22.09%	-10.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.93%	22.09%	-8.16%