PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UC84.L vs. 5ESG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UC84.L vs. 5ESG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC84.L) and UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC84.L achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than 5ESG.L's 9.48% return.


UC84.L

1D
0.23%
1M
1.54%
YTD
0.32%
6M
-0.15%
1Y
6.36%
3Y*
2.40%
5Y*
1.22%
10Y*
3.15%

5ESG.L

1D
0.70%
1M
4.76%
YTD
9.48%
6M
10.78%
1Y
30.17%
3Y*
21.08%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC84.L vs. 5ESG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UC84.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.32%0.41%3.96%2.43%-7.77%-0.84%6.02%8.91%
5ESG.L
UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist
9.48%18.26%23.62%26.17%-20.24%31.59%15.77%14.68%

Correlation

The correlation between UC84.L and 5ESG.L is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2019

-0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UC84.L vs. 5ESG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC84.L
UC84.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
UC84.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC84.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC84.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
UC84.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC84.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

5ESG.L
5ESG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
5ESG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC84.L vs. 5ESG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC84.L) and UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UC84.L5ESG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.48

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

3.33

-2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.20

14.65

-11.45

UC84.L vs. 5ESG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC84.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the 5ESG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC84.L and 5ESG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UC84.L5ESG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

2.62

-1.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.88

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

1.05

-0.65

Drawdowns

UC84.L vs. 5ESG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC84.L drawdown since its inception was -18.73%, smaller than the maximum 5ESG.L drawdown of -31.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC84.L and 5ESG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UC84.L5ESG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.73%

-31.50%

+12.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.83%

-9.01%

+4.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.52%

-19.53%

+11.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.49%

-25.41%

+10.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.33%

-0.07%

-8.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.19%

-5.69%

-2.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

2.05%

-0.07%

Volatility

UC84.L vs. 5ESG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC84.L) is 1.50%, while UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L) has a volatility of 3.46%. This indicates that UC84.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 5ESG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UC84.L5ESG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

3.46%

-1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.47%

8.51%

-4.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.08%

11.46%

-5.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.08%

16.54%

-7.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.40%

19.13%

-8.73%

UC84.L vs. 5ESG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC84.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than 5ESG.L's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UC84.L vs. 5ESG.L - Dividend Comparison

UC84.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, more than 5ESG.L's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
5ESG.L
UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist
0.62%0.87%0.47%1.07%1.32%0.89%1.25%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UC84.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
5.52%4.82%4.55%4.27%2.69%2.28%3.02%3.48%3.37%2.98%3.21%1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


UC84.L and 5ESG.L have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 5ESG.L is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

5ESG.L is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for UC84.L.

UC84.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while 5ESG.L is S&P 500. UC84.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while 5ESG.L tracks S&P 500 ESG Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for UC84.L and 0.17% for 5ESG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UC84.L and 5ESG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer