PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UC81.L vs. UC84.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UC81.L vs. UC84.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC81.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC84.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC81.L achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly higher than UC84.L's 0.32% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UC81.L having a 3.31% annualized return and UC84.L not far behind at 3.15%.


UC81.L

1D
0.17%
1M
1.15%
YTD
0.48%
6M
0.05%
1Y
5.60%
3Y*
2.64%
5Y*
3.20%
10Y*
3.31%

UC84.L

1D
0.23%
1M
1.24%
YTD
0.32%
6M
-0.24%
1Y
6.75%
3Y*
2.40%
5Y*
1.22%
10Y*
3.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC81.L vs. UC84.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UC81.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.48%-0.20%6.44%0.38%4.76%0.32%1.51%4.23%6.12%-6.53%
UC84.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.32%0.41%3.96%2.43%-7.77%-0.84%6.02%13.64%2.44%-3.36%

Correlation

The correlation between UC81.L and UC84.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2014

0.84

The correlation between UC81.L and UC84.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UC81.L vs. UC84.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC81.L
UC81.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
UC81.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC81.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC81.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
UC81.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC81.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

UC84.L
UC84.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
UC84.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC84.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC84.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
UC84.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC84.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC81.L vs. UC84.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC81.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC84.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UC81.LUC84.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.18

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

1.31

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.19

3.20

-0.02

UC81.L vs. UC84.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC81.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the UC84.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC81.L and UC84.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UC81.LUC84.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

1.04

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.13

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.30

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.39

+0.04

Drawdowns

UC81.L vs. UC84.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC81.L drawdown since its inception was -14.94%, smaller than the maximum UC84.L drawdown of -18.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC81.L and UC84.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UC81.LUC84.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.94%

-18.73%

+3.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.29%

-4.83%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.01%

-8.52%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.31%

-14.49%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.94%

-18.73%

+3.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.57%

-8.33%

+5.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.56%

-8.19%

+2.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

1.98%

-0.31%

Volatility

UC81.L vs. UC84.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC81.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC84.L) have volatilities of 1.51% and 1.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UC81.LUC84.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

1.50%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.27%

4.47%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.82%

6.08%

-0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.78%

9.08%

-1.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.16%

10.40%

-1.24%

UC81.L vs. UC84.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UC81.L and UC84.L have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UC81.L vs. UC84.L - Dividend Comparison

UC81.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, less than UC84.L's 5.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UC81.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
4.67%5.59%4.77%3.28%1.36%1.58%2.75%2.90%2.20%2.16%1.86%0.84%
UC84.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
5.52%4.82%4.55%4.27%2.69%2.28%3.02%3.48%3.37%2.98%3.21%1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


UC81.L and UC84.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UC81.L and UC84.L have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

UC81.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD, while UC84.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UC81.L and UC84.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer