PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UC81.L vs. EMVL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UC81.L vs. EMVL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC81.L) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UC81.L is traded in GBp, while EMVL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EMVL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC81.L achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than EMVL.L's 48.17% return.


UC81.L

1D
0.17%
1M
1.13%
YTD
0.48%
6M
0.19%
1Y
5.34%
3Y*
2.64%
5Y*
3.20%
10Y*
3.31%

EMVL.L

1D
0.00%
1M
14.71%
YTD
48.17%
6M
50.86%
1Y
92.57%
3Y*
35.35%
5Y*
18.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC81.L vs. EMVL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UC81.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.48%-0.20%6.44%0.38%4.76%0.32%1.51%2.65%
EMVL.L
iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc)
44.41%32.93%16.48%12.46%-6.33%6.28%2.62%13.52%

Correlation

The correlation between UC81.L and EMVL.L is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UC81.L vs. EMVL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC81.L
UC81.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
UC81.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC81.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC81.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
UC81.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC81.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

EMVL.L
EMVL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
EMVL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC81.L vs. EMVL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC81.L) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UC81.LEMVL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.79

-0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

9.18

-7.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.19

28.06

-24.87

UC81.L vs. EMVL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC81.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the EMVL.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC81.L and EMVL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UC81.LEMVL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

4.66

-3.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.98

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.84

-0.41

Drawdowns

UC81.L vs. EMVL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC81.L drawdown since its inception was -14.94%, smaller than the maximum EMVL.L drawdown of -25.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC81.L and EMVL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UC81.LEMVL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.94%

-25.84%

+10.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.29%

-9.93%

+5.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.01%

-15.76%

+7.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.31%

-20.28%

+5.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.57%

-1.41%

-1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.56%

-6.14%

+0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

3.27%

-1.60%

Volatility

UC81.L vs. EMVL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC81.L) is 1.51%, while iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L) has a volatility of 8.68%. This indicates that UC81.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMVL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UC81.LEMVL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

8.68%

-7.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.27%

16.45%

-12.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.82%

19.58%

-13.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.78%

18.40%

-10.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.16%

20.72%

-11.56%

UC81.L vs. EMVL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC81.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than EMVL.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

UC81.L vs. EMVL.L - Dividend Comparison

UC81.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, while EMVL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMVL.L
iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UC81.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
4.67%5.59%4.77%3.28%1.36%1.58%2.75%2.90%2.20%2.16%1.86%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


UC81.L and EMVL.L have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UC81.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UC81.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for EMVL.L.

UC81.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while EMVL.L is Emerging Markets Equities. UC81.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD, while EMVL.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for UC81.L and 0.40% for EMVL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UC81.L and EMVL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer