PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UC63.L vs. LDEU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UC63.L vs. LDEU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis (UC63.L) and L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (LDEU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UC63.L is traded in GBp, while LDEU.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LDEU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC63.L achieves a 8.47% return, which is significantly lower than LDEU.L's 12.58% return.


UC63.L

1D
0.41%
1M
0.84%
6M
5.27%
YTD
8.47%
1Y
22.18%
3Y*
16.38%
5Y*
12.93%
10Y*
8.44%

LDEU.L

1D
0.29%
1M
-1.06%
6M
9.88%
YTD
12.58%
1Y
27.34%
3Y*
24.57%
5Y*
16.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC63.L vs. LDEU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UC63.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis
8.47%25.75%9.16%6.95%7.38%10.05%
LDEU.L
L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
12.58%44.92%9.43%14.43%1.84%5.93%

Correlation

The correlation between UC63.L and LDEU.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2021

0.72

The correlation between UC63.L and LDEU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UC63.L vs. LDEU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC63.L
UC63.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
UC63.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC63.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC63.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
UC63.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC63.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

LDEU.L
LDEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
LDEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
LDEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC63.L vs. LDEU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis (UC63.L) and L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (LDEU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UC63.LLDEU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.41

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

3.44

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.79

12.17

-4.38

UC63.L vs. LDEU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC63.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the LDEU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC63.L and LDEU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UC63.L vs. LDEU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC63.L drawdown since its inception was -34.55%, which is greater than LDEU.L's maximum drawdown of -17.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC63.L and LDEU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UC63.LLDEU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.55%

-17.44%

-17.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.05%

-7.91%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.95%

-13.34%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.95%

-17.44%

+4.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-1.06%

-0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.78%

-2.98%

-1.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

2.24%

+0.60%

Volatility

UC63.L vs. LDEU.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis (UC63.L) and L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (LDEU.L) have volatilities of 3.11% and 3.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UC63.LLDEU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.11%

3.03%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.98%

9.62%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.64%

11.78%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.85%

14.58%

-1.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.88%

14.42%

+0.46%

UC63.L vs. LDEU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC63.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than LDEU.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UC63.L vs. LDEU.L - Dividend Comparison

UC63.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, less than LDEU.L's 3.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LDEU.L
L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
3.50%3.47%4.36%4.44%4.17%2.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UC63.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis
2.80%2.73%3.12%3.69%3.71%3.22%3.86%4.21%3.55%4.46%2.14%4.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


UC63.L and LDEU.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UC63.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UC63.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LDEU.L.

UC63.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while LDEU.L tracks FTSE Developed Europe ex UK All Cap ex CW ex TC ex REITS Dividend Growth with Quality Net Tax Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UC63.L and 0.25% for LDEU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UC63.L and LDEU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer