UC55.L vs. JPLG.L
UC55.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and JPLG.L (JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from UBS and JPMorgan respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UC55.L returned 12.77%/yr vs 10.40%/yr for JPLG.L. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UC55.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for JPLG.L.
Performance
UC55.L vs. JPLG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UC55.L achieves a 9.94% return, which is significantly lower than JPLG.L's 10.77% return.
UC55.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 9.94%
- 6M
- 9.79%
- 1Y
- 26.82%
- 3Y*
- 17.39%
- 5Y*
- 12.77%
- 10Y*
- 13.61%
JPLG.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- YTD
- 10.77%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 23.28%
- 3Y*
- 13.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.40%
- 10Y*
- —
UC55.L vs. JPLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UC55.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 9.94% | 12.47% | 20.76% | 17.25% | -8.62% | 23.36% | 11.95% | 0.65% |
JPLG.L JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating | 10.77% | 10.11% | 12.09% | 7.05% | 0.72% | 24.67% | 2.57% | -0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between UC55.L and JPLG.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.85 |
The correlation between UC55.L and JPLG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
UC55.L vs. JPLG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UC55.L
JPLG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
UC55.L
JPLG.L
Financial Services
UC55.L
JPLG.L
Industrials
UC55.L
JPLG.L
Consumer Cyclical
UC55.L
JPLG.L
Communication Services
UC55.L
JPLG.L
Healthcare
UC55.L
JPLG.L
Consumer Defensive
UC55.L
JPLG.L
Energy
UC55.L
JPLG.L
Basic Materials
UC55.L
JPLG.L
Utilities
UC55.L
JPLG.L
Real Estate
UC55.L
JPLG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UC55.L vs. JPLG.L — Risk / Return Rank
UC55.L
JPLG.L
UC55.L vs. JPLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC55.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UC55.L | JPLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.52 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.04 | 4.09 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.01 | 15.27 | +0.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UC55.L | JPLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | 2.90 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.95 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.69 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
UC55.L vs. JPLG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UC55.L drawdown since its inception was -28.07%, roughly equal to the maximum JPLG.L drawdown of -27.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC55.L and JPLG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UC55.L | JPLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.07% | -27.53% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.63% | -5.59% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.92% | -13.65% | -5.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.92% | -13.65% | -5.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | 0.00% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.35% | -3.30% | -0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 1.50% | +0.18% |
Volatility
UC55.L vs. JPLG.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC55.L) has a higher volatility of 2.50% compared to JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) at 1.96%. This indicates that UC55.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPLG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UC55.L | JPLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.50% | 1.96% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.22% | 5.88% | +1.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.02% | 7.87% | +2.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.29% | 10.90% | +2.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.85% | 13.75% | +1.10% |
UC55.L vs. JPLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UC55.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than JPLG.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
UC55.L vs. JPLG.L - Dividend Comparison
UC55.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, while JPLG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPLG.L JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UC55.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.90% | 1.02% | 1.10% | 1.30% | 1.38% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.66% | 1.66% | 1.70% | 1.72% | 1.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UC55.L and JPLG.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JPLG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JPLG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for UC55.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for UC55.L and 0.20% for JPLG.L.
Find the right allocation for UC55.L and JPLG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer