UC55.L vs. CHRG.L
UC55.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and CHRG.L (WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - UC55.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while CHRG.L is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Battery Solutions Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UC55.L returned 12.77%/yr vs 5.81%/yr for CHRG.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UC55.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for CHRG.L.
Performance
UC55.L vs. CHRG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UC55.L achieves a 9.94% return, which is significantly lower than CHRG.L's 33.50% return.
UC55.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 9.94%
- 6M
- 9.79%
- 1Y
- 26.82%
- 3Y*
- 17.39%
- 5Y*
- 12.77%
- 10Y*
- 13.61%
CHRG.L
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 33.50%
- 6M
- 28.22%
- 1Y
- 107.04%
- 3Y*
- 14.40%
- 5Y*
- 5.81%
- 10Y*
- —
UC55.L vs. CHRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UC55.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 9.94% | 12.47% | 20.76% | 17.25% | -8.62% | 23.36% | 16.91% |
CHRG.L WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 33.50% | 44.29% | -11.91% | -9.67% | -19.10% | 14.89% | 72.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between UC55.L and CHRG.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2020 | 0.62 |
The correlation between UC55.L and CHRG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
UC55.L vs. CHRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UC55.L
CHRG.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
UC55.L
CHRG.L
Financial Services
UC55.L
CHRG.L
-
Industrials
UC55.L
CHRG.L
Consumer Cyclical
UC55.L
CHRG.L
Communication Services
UC55.L
CHRG.L
-
Healthcare
UC55.L
CHRG.L
-
Consumer Defensive
UC55.L
CHRG.L
Energy
UC55.L
CHRG.L
Basic Materials
UC55.L
CHRG.L
Utilities
UC55.L
CHRG.L
Real Estate
UC55.L
CHRG.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UC55.L vs. CHRG.L — Risk / Return Rank
UC55.L
CHRG.L
UC55.L vs. CHRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC55.L) and WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UC55.L | CHRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.54 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.04 | 3.54 | +0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.01 | 6.55 | +9.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UC55.L | CHRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | 2.01 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.19 | +0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.52 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
UC55.L vs. CHRG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UC55.L drawdown since its inception was -28.07%, smaller than the maximum CHRG.L drawdown of -52.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC55.L and CHRG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UC55.L | CHRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.07% | -52.64% | +24.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.63% | -29.68% | +23.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.92% | -39.46% | +20.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.92% | -52.64% | +33.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -3.57% | +3.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.35% | -22.33% | +18.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 16.07% | -14.39% |
Volatility
UC55.L vs. CHRG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC55.L) is 2.50%, while WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L) has a volatility of 10.23%. This indicates that UC55.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UC55.L | CHRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.50% | 10.23% | -7.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.22% | 18.94% | -11.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.02% | 52.29% | -42.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.29% | 30.08% | -16.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.85% | 29.54% | -14.69% |
UC55.L vs. CHRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UC55.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than CHRG.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
UC55.L vs. CHRG.L - Dividend Comparison
UC55.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, while CHRG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRG.L WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UC55.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.90% | 1.02% | 1.10% | 1.30% | 1.38% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.66% | 1.66% | 1.70% | 1.72% | 1.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UC55.L and CHRG.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UC55.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UC55.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CHRG.L.
UC55.L is categorized as Global Equities, while CHRG.L is Alternative Energy Equities. UC55.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while CHRG.L tracks WisdomTree Battery Solutions Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for UC55.L and 0.40% for CHRG.L.
Find the right allocation for UC55.L and CHRG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer