PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UC55.L vs. CHRG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UC55.L vs. CHRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC55.L) and WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC55.L achieves a 9.94% return, which is significantly lower than CHRG.L's 33.50% return.


UC55.L

1D
0.04%
1M
3.77%
YTD
9.94%
6M
9.79%
1Y
26.82%
3Y*
17.39%
5Y*
12.77%
10Y*
13.61%

CHRG.L

1D
-0.93%
1M
0.47%
YTD
33.50%
6M
28.22%
1Y
107.04%
3Y*
14.40%
5Y*
5.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC55.L vs. CHRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
UC55.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
9.94%12.47%20.76%17.25%-8.62%23.36%16.91%
CHRG.L
WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc
33.50%44.29%-11.91%-9.67%-19.10%14.89%72.90%

Correlation

The correlation between UC55.L and CHRG.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2020

0.62

The correlation between UC55.L and CHRG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

UC55.L vs. CHRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UC55.L
CHRG.L

Technology

30.2%
8.2%

Financial Services

15.4%

-

Industrials

10.9%
48.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
15.5%

Communication Services

9.1%

-

Healthcare

8.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
0.0%

Energy

4.1%
6.1%

Basic Materials

3.2%
20.3%

Utilities

2.5%
1.3%

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Technology

UC55.L
30.2%
CHRG.L
8.2%

Financial Services

UC55.L
15.4%
CHRG.L

-

Industrials

UC55.L
10.9%
CHRG.L
48.7%

Consumer Cyclical

UC55.L
9.1%
CHRG.L
15.5%

Communication Services

UC55.L
9.1%
CHRG.L

-

Healthcare

UC55.L
8.6%
CHRG.L

-

Consumer Defensive

UC55.L
5.1%
CHRG.L
0.0%

Energy

UC55.L
4.1%
CHRG.L
6.1%

Basic Materials

UC55.L
3.2%
CHRG.L
20.3%

Utilities

UC55.L
2.5%
CHRG.L
1.3%

Real Estate

UC55.L
1.8%
CHRG.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UC55.L vs. CHRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC55.L
UC55.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
UC55.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC55.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC55.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
UC55.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC55.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

CHRG.L
CHRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
CHRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC55.L vs. CHRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC55.L) and WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UC55.LCHRG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.54

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.04

3.54

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.01

6.55

+9.45

UC55.L vs. CHRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC55.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the CHRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC55.L and CHRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UC55.LCHRG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

2.01

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.19

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.52

+0.30

Drawdowns

UC55.L vs. CHRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC55.L drawdown since its inception was -28.07%, smaller than the maximum CHRG.L drawdown of -52.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC55.L and CHRG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UC55.LCHRG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.07%

-52.64%

+24.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.63%

-29.68%

+23.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.92%

-39.46%

+20.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.92%

-52.64%

+33.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-3.57%

+3.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.35%

-22.33%

+18.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

16.07%

-14.39%

Volatility

UC55.L vs. CHRG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC55.L) is 2.50%, while WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L) has a volatility of 10.23%. This indicates that UC55.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UC55.LCHRG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

10.23%

-7.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.22%

18.94%

-11.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.02%

52.29%

-42.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.29%

30.08%

-16.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.85%

29.54%

-14.69%

UC55.L vs. CHRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC55.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than CHRG.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

UC55.L vs. CHRG.L - Dividend Comparison

UC55.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, while CHRG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHRG.L
WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UC55.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.90%1.02%1.10%1.30%1.38%1.01%1.28%1.66%1.66%1.70%1.72%1.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


UC55.L and CHRG.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UC55.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UC55.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CHRG.L.

UC55.L is categorized as Global Equities, while CHRG.L is Alternative Energy Equities. UC55.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while CHRG.L tracks WisdomTree Battery Solutions Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for UC55.L and 0.40% for CHRG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UC55.L and CHRG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer