UC46.L vs. SUUS.L

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

UC46.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and SUUS.L (iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from UBS and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UC46.L returned 12.21%/yr vs 12.15%/yr for SUUS.L. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. UC46.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SUUS.L.

Performance

UC46.L vs. SUUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC46.L) and iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC46.L achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly lower than SUUS.L's 12.79% return.

UC46.L

• 1D: -1.40%
• 1M: 5.08%
• YTD: 12.10%
• 6M: 10.54%
• 1Y: 25.11%
• 3Y*: 16.15%
• 5Y*: 12.21%
• 10Y*: 15.20%

SUUS.L

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: 3.72%
• YTD: 12.79%
• 6M: 12.04%
• 1Y: 24.38%
• 3Y*: 14.16%
• 5Y*: 12.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC46.L vs. SUUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UC46.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	12.10%	2.79%	21.13%	25.01%	-16.49%	32.62%	18.59%	25.18%	0.87%	11.39%
SUUS.L iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	12.79%	3.44%	15.85%	17.58%	-8.97%	32.89%	21.52%	27.36%	2.89%	12.51%

Correlation

The correlation between UC46.L and SUUS.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2016	0.97

The correlation between UC46.L and SUUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

UC46.L vs. SUUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UC46.L	SUUS.L
Technology	44.2%	41.6%
Financial Services	12.0%	11.8%
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	9.3%
Industrials	9.9%	8.1%
Healthcare	9.1%	8.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	5.4%
Communication Services	3.6%	9.1%
Real Estate	2.8%	2.1%
Basic Materials	1.6%	2.5%
Utilities	0.7%	1.5%
Energy	-	-

Return for Risk

UC46.L vs. SUUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC46.L

UC46.L Risk / Return Rank: 63
UC46.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
UC46.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
UC46.L Omega Ratio Rank: 68
UC46.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
UC46.L Martin Ratio Rank: 54

SUUS.L

SUUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 70
SUUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
SUUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
SUUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 69
SUUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
SUUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC46.L vs. SUUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC46.L) and iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UC46.L	SUUS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	2.09	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.84	2.91	-0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.37	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	3.36	-0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.28	11.48	-3.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UC46.L vs. SUUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC46.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the SUUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC46.L and SUUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UC46.L	SUUS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.05	2.09	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	0.60	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.57	+0.02

Drawdowns

UC46.L vs. SUUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC46.L drawdown since its inception was -41.58%, which is greater than SUUS.L's maximum drawdown of -25.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC46.L and SUUS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	UC46.L	SUUS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.58%	-25.46%	-16.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.80%	-7.22%	-2.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.59%	-21.62%	-0.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.06%	-21.62%	-1.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.98%	-1.20%	-0.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.44%	-6.40%	-2.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.03%	2.12%	+0.91%

Volatility

UC46.L vs. SUUS.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC46.L) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUUS.L) at 3.60%. This indicates that UC46.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SUUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UC46.L	SUUS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.04%	3.60%	+0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.02%	8.56%	+0.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.20%	11.59%	+0.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.75%	20.12%	-4.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.28%	20.04%	-3.76%

UC46.L vs. SUUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC46.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than SUUS.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

UC46.L vs. SUUS.L - Dividend Comparison

UC46.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, while SUUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SUUS.L iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UC46.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	0.43%	0.80%	0.72%	0.75%	0.86%	0.64%	0.87%	1.03%	1.02%	1.23%	1.18%	1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UC46.L and SUUS.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, UC46.L and SUUS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, UC46.L or SUUS.L?

On fees, SUUS.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UC46.L or SUUS.L?

SUUS.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for UC46.L.

What is the main difference between UC46.L and SUUS.L?

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for UC46.L and 0.20% for SUUS.L.