PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
UC13.L vs. XEWG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

UC13.L vs. XEWG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UC13.L (UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis) and XEWG.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged) are both S&P 500 funds - UC13.L tracks the S&P 500 Index while XEWG.L tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight (GBP Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UC13.L returned 17.70%/yr vs 14.34%/yr for XEWG.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UC13.L charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for XEWG.L.

Performance

UC13.L vs. XEWG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged (XEWG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UC13.L is traded in GBp, while XEWG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XEWG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC13.L achieves a 9.92% return, which is significantly higher than XEWG.L's 8.81% return.

UC13.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
5.52%
YTD
9.92%
6M
9.83%
1Y
27.83%
3Y*
17.70%
5Y*
13.62%
10Y*
14.50%

XEWG.L

1D
0.04%
1M
3.41%
YTD
8.81%
6M
10.01%
1Y
18.80%
3Y*
14.34%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC13.L vs. XEWG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UC13.L
UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis		9.92%8.39%25.77%18.14%-10.01%2.44%
XEWG.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged		8.81%11.07%11.66%11.87%-14.07%1.31%

Correlation

The correlation between UC13.L and XEWG.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021

0.63

The correlation between UC13.L and XEWG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UC13.L vs. XEWG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
UC13.L
XEWG.L

Technology

37.9%
18.3%

Financial Services

11.3%
14.4%

Communication Services

10.9%
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
10.3%

Healthcare

8.3%
10.9%

Industrials

7.8%
14.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
6.5%

Energy

3.4%
4.6%

Utilities

2.2%
6.1%

Real Estate

1.9%
6.2%

Basic Materials

1.7%
4.1%

Technology

UC13.L
37.9%
XEWG.L
18.3%

Financial Services

UC13.L
11.3%
XEWG.L
14.4%

Communication Services

UC13.L
10.9%
XEWG.L
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

UC13.L
9.8%
XEWG.L
10.3%

Healthcare

UC13.L
8.3%
XEWG.L
10.9%

Industrials

UC13.L
7.8%
XEWG.L
14.7%

Consumer Defensive

UC13.L
4.8%
XEWG.L
6.5%

Energy

UC13.L
3.4%
XEWG.L
4.6%

Utilities

UC13.L
2.2%
XEWG.L
6.1%

Real Estate

UC13.L
1.9%
XEWG.L
6.2%

Basic Materials

UC13.L
1.7%
XEWG.L
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis

Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged

Often compared with UC13.L:
UC13.L vs. VUSA.LUC13.L vs. CSPX.LUC13.L vs. VOOUC13.L vs. SPXP.LUC13.L vs. SPYUC13.L vs. XDPG.LUC13.L vs. I500.L
Often compared with XEWG.L:
XEWG.L vs. IUMS.LXEWG.L vs. XDEQ.LXEWG.L vs. IDUS.LXEWG.L vs. XDPP.LXEWG.L vs. S5EE.LXEWG.L vs. XS2D.LXEWG.L vs. PQVM.L

Return for Risk

UC13.L vs. XEWG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
UC13.L
UC13.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
UC13.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC13.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC13.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
UC13.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC13.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
XEWG.L
XEWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
XEWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
XEWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC13.L vs. XEWG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged (XEWG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

UC13.LXEWG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.65
1.81

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.55
2.76

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.32

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

2.82

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.58

9.95

+2.63

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UC13.L vs. XEWG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC13.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the XEWG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC13.L and XEWG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

UC13.LXEWG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

1.81

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.37

+0.51

Drawdowns

UC13.L vs. XEWG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC13.L drawdown since its inception was -25.59%, which is greater than XEWG.L's maximum drawdown of -22.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC13.L and XEWG.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

UC13.LXEWG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.59%

-22.61%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-6.85%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.52%

-18.42%

-3.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.52%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.59%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

0.00%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-6.89%

+3.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

1.94%

+0.27%

Volatility

UC13.L vs. XEWG.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged (XEWG.L) have volatilities of 2.63% and 2.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

UC13.LXEWG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

2.58%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.11%

7.36%

-0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.47%

10.70%

-0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

16.55%

-2.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

16.55%

-0.83%

UC13.L vs. XEWG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC13.L has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than XEWG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

UC13.L vs. XEWG.L - Dividend Comparison

UC13.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than XEWG.L's 1.19% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UC13.L
UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis		0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.02%
XEWG.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged		1.19%1.25%1.50%1.24%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

UC13.L and XEWG.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UC13.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UC13.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XEWG.L.

UC13.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while XEWG.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight (GBP Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for UC13.L and 0.30% for XEWG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UC13.L and XEWG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer