UC13.L vs. XDWE.L
UC13.L (UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis) and XDWE.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C) are both S&P 500 funds - UC13.L tracks the S&P 500 Index while XDWE.L tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UC13.L returned 15.47%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for XDWE.L. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UC13.L charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XDWE.L.
Performance
UC13.L vs. XDWE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UC13.L achieves a 9.47% return, which is significantly lower than XDWE.L's 12.77% return. Over the past 10 years, UC13.L has outperformed XDWE.L with an annualized return of 15.47%, while XDWE.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.34% annualized return.
UC13.L
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 9.47%
- 6M
- 9.62%
- 1Y
- 25.95%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- 13.96%
- 10Y*
- 15.47%
XDWE.L
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 4.41%
- YTD
- 12.77%
- 6M
- 13.15%
- 1Y
- 24.09%
- 3Y*
- 13.57%
- 5Y*
- 9.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
UC13.L vs. XDWE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UC13.L UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis | 9.47% | 9.50% | 27.24% | 19.64% | -8.96% | 30.93% | 13.50% | 26.37% | -0.07% | 10.75% |
XDWE.L Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C | 12.77% | 3.94% | 14.06% | 7.78% | -1.34% | 31.37% | 7.89% | 23.88% | -3.60% | 7.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between UC13.L and XDWE.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2014 | 0.89 |
Over the past year, the correlation between UC13.L and XDWE.L has dropped to 0.67 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
UC13.L vs. XDWE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UC13.L
XDWE.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
UC13.L
XDWE.L
Financial Services
UC13.L
XDWE.L
Communication Services
UC13.L
XDWE.L
Consumer Cyclical
UC13.L
XDWE.L
Healthcare
UC13.L
XDWE.L
Industrials
UC13.L
XDWE.L
Consumer Defensive
UC13.L
XDWE.L
Energy
UC13.L
XDWE.L
Utilities
UC13.L
XDWE.L
Real Estate
UC13.L
XDWE.L
Basic Materials
UC13.L
XDWE.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UC13.L vs. XDWE.L — Risk / Return Rank
UC13.L
XDWE.L
UC13.L vs. XDWE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UC13.L | XDWE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.46 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.55 | 4.25 | -0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.53 | 13.62 | -1.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UC13.L vs. XDWE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UC13.L drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, smaller than the maximum XDWE.L drawdown of -98.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC13.L and XDWE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UC13.L | XDWE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.33% | -98.55% | +59.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.28% | -5.64% | -1.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.11% | -19.89% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.11% | -19.89% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.59% | -31.08% | +5.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.57% | 0.00% | -1.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.82% | -4.84% | -1.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 1.77% | +0.30% |
Volatility
UC13.L vs. XDWE.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L) at 2.21%. This indicates that UC13.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UC13.L | XDWE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 2.21% | +1.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.76% | 6.60% | +1.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.97% | 9.70% | +1.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.52% | 19.53% | -5.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 18.63% | -3.06% |
UC13.L vs. XDWE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UC13.L has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWE.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UC13.L vs. XDWE.L - Dividend Comparison
UC13.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, while XDWE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UC13.L UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis | 0.96% | 0.96% | 0.99% | 1.16% | 1.23% | 0.94% | 1.36% | 1.44% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.55% | 1.52% |
XDWE.L Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UC13.L and XDWE.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UC13.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UC13.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XDWE.L.
UC13.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while XDWE.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for UC13.L and 0.20% for XDWE.L.
Find the right allocation for UC13.L and XDWE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer