PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UC13.L vs. SPES.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UC13.L vs. SPES.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPES.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with UC13.L having a 9.92% return and SPES.L slightly lower at 9.65%.


UC13.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
4.54%
YTD
9.92%
6M
9.21%
1Y
27.71%
3Y*
17.70%
5Y*
13.62%
10Y*
14.50%

SPES.L

1D
0.43%
1M
4.02%
YTD
9.65%
6M
9.29%
1Y
21.49%
3Y*
12.28%
5Y*
9.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC13.L vs. SPES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UC13.L
UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis
9.92%8.39%25.77%18.14%-10.01%19.17%
SPES.L
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist
9.65%3.95%13.66%8.18%-1.34%28.07%

Correlation

The correlation between UC13.L and SPES.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2021

0.82

The correlation between UC13.L and SPES.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UC13.L vs. SPES.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UC13.L
SPES.L

Technology

37.9%
20.1%

Financial Services

11.3%
14.2%

Communication Services

10.9%
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
9.9%

Healthcare

8.3%
11.2%

Industrials

7.8%
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
6.5%

Energy

3.4%
4.2%

Utilities

2.2%
5.8%

Real Estate

1.9%
6.2%

Basic Materials

1.7%
3.9%

Technology

UC13.L
37.9%
SPES.L
20.1%

Financial Services

UC13.L
11.3%
SPES.L
14.2%

Communication Services

UC13.L
10.9%
SPES.L
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

UC13.L
9.8%
SPES.L
9.9%

Healthcare

UC13.L
8.3%
SPES.L
11.2%

Industrials

UC13.L
7.8%
SPES.L
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

UC13.L
4.8%
SPES.L
6.5%

Energy

UC13.L
3.4%
SPES.L
4.2%

Utilities

UC13.L
2.2%
SPES.L
5.8%

Real Estate

UC13.L
1.9%
SPES.L
6.2%

Basic Materials

UC13.L
1.7%
SPES.L
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UC13.L vs. SPES.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC13.L
UC13.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
UC13.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC13.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC13.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
UC13.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC13.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SPES.L
SPES.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SPES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SPES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC13.L vs. SPES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UC13.LSPES.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.39

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

3.66

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.58

11.92

+0.66

UC13.L vs. SPES.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC13.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the SPES.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC13.L and SPES.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UC13.LSPES.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

2.18

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.67

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.80

+0.09

Drawdowns

UC13.L vs. SPES.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC13.L drawdown since its inception was -25.59%, which is greater than SPES.L's maximum drawdown of -19.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC13.L and SPES.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UC13.LSPES.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.59%

-19.65%

-5.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-5.74%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.52%

-19.65%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.52%

-19.65%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

0.00%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-4.12%

+0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

1.76%

+0.45%

Volatility

UC13.L vs. SPES.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L) has a higher volatility of 2.63% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPES.L) at 2.05%. This indicates that UC13.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UC13.LSPES.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

2.05%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.11%

6.43%

+0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.47%

9.61%

+0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

13.97%

+0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

14.70%

+1.02%

UC13.L vs. SPES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC13.L has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SPES.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UC13.L vs. SPES.L - Dividend Comparison

UC13.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than SPES.L's 1.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPES.L
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist
1.27%1.37%1.36%1.48%1.49%0.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UC13.L
UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis
0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


UC13.L and SPES.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UC13.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UC13.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SPES.L.

UC13.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while SPES.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for UC13.L and 0.20% for SPES.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UC13.L and SPES.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer