PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBXX.L vs. JMBP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBXX.L vs. JMBP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF hGBP dis (UBXX.L) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist) (JMBP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UBXX.L is traded in GBp, while JMBP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the JMBP.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBXX.L achieves a 2.27% return, which is significantly higher than JMBP.L's 2.12% return.


UBXX.L

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.49%
YTD
2.27%
6M
2.40%
1Y
7.40%
3Y*
8.00%
5Y*
2.42%
10Y*

JMBP.L

1D
0.47%
1M
1.60%
YTD
2.12%
6M
2.28%
1Y
10.38%
3Y*
7.50%
5Y*
0.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBXX.L vs. JMBP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UBXX.L
UBS J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF hGBP dis
2.27%9.71%7.01%7.14%-11.07%-0.10%1.69%1.49%
JMBP.L
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist)
2.12%13.12%1.60%8.38%-17.58%-2.86%3.67%3.36%

Correlation

The correlation between UBXX.L and JMBP.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2019

0.75

The correlation between UBXX.L and JMBP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBXX.L vs. JMBP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBXX.L
UBXX.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
UBXX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBXX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBXX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
UBXX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBXX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

JMBP.L
JMBP.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
JMBP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMBP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMBP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
JMBP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMBP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBXX.L vs. JMBP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF hGBP dis (UBXX.L) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist) (JMBP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UBXX.LJMBP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.36

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.81

2.24

+1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.55

9.52

+8.03

UBXX.L vs. JMBP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBXX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the JMBP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBXX.L and JMBP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UBXX.L vs. JMBP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBXX.L drawdown since its inception was -16.83%, smaller than the maximum JMBP.L drawdown of -27.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBXX.L and JMBP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBXX.LJMBP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.83%

-27.19%

+10.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.93%

-4.53%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.59%

-7.61%

+5.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.83%

-26.88%

+10.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.11%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-9.84%

+6.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.42%

1.07%

-0.65%

Volatility

UBXX.L vs. JMBP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF hGBP dis (UBXX.L) is 0.70%, while JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist) (JMBP.L) has a volatility of 1.36%. This indicates that UBXX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JMBP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBXX.LJMBP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.70%

1.36%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.35%

4.58%

-2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88%

5.51%

-2.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.25%

8.49%

-4.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.94%

10.48%

-5.54%

UBXX.L vs. JMBP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBXX.L has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than JMBP.L's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

UBXX.L vs. JMBP.L - Dividend Comparison

UBXX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.47%, more than JMBP.L's 5.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
JMBP.L
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist)
5.72%5.61%5.83%5.24%5.16%3.70%4.42%0.00%0.00%
UBXX.L
UBS J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF hGBP dis
6.47%25.71%7.05%4.76%4.40%3.91%4.43%6.18%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


UBXX.L and JMBP.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JMBP.L is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JMBP.L is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for UBXX.L.

UBXX.L tracks J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Diversified 1-5 Year Index, while JMBP.L tracks JP Morgan Emerging Markets Risk-Aware Bond (GBP Hedged). They also come from different issuers: UBS and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for UBXX.L and 0.39% for JMBP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBXX.L and JMBP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer