PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBXX.L vs. IEMB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBXX.L vs. IEMB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF hGBP dis (UBXX.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IEMB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UBXX.L is traded in GBp, while IEMB.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IEMB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with UBXX.L having a 2.14% return and IEMB.L slightly lower at 2.04%.


UBXX.L

1D
0.01%
1M
0.08%
YTD
2.14%
6M
2.55%
1Y
8.02%
3Y*
8.13%
5Y*
2.38%
10Y*

IEMB.L

1D
0.41%
1M
1.93%
YTD
2.04%
6M
1.52%
1Y
12.28%
3Y*
6.96%
5Y*
3.01%
10Y*
4.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBXX.L vs. IEMB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UBXX.L
UBS J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF hGBP dis
2.14%9.71%7.01%7.14%-11.07%-0.10%1.69%5.94%-1.40%
IEMB.L
iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.01%5.61%7.55%5.01%-8.65%-1.35%2.47%11.65%5.26%

Correlation

The correlation between UBXX.L and IEMB.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2018

0.39

The correlation between UBXX.L and IEMB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBXX.L vs. IEMB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBXX.L
UBXX.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
UBXX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBXX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBXX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
UBXX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBXX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

IEMB.L
IEMB.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IEMB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBXX.L vs. IEMB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF hGBP dis (UBXX.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IEMB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UBXX.LIEMB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.30

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.13

2.79

+1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.08

8.29

+10.78

UBXX.L vs. IEMB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBXX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the IEMB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBXX.L and IEMB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UBXX.LIEMB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

1.70

+1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.32

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.58

-0.10

Drawdowns

UBXX.L vs. IEMB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBXX.L drawdown since its inception was -16.83%, smaller than the maximum IEMB.L drawdown of -23.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBXX.L and IEMB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBXX.LIEMB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.83%

-23.09%

+6.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.93%

-4.38%

+2.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.59%

-9.30%

+6.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.83%

-14.68%

-2.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

0.00%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-6.04%

+2.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.42%

1.48%

-1.06%

Volatility

UBXX.L vs. IEMB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF hGBP dis (UBXX.L) is 0.67%, while iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IEMB.L) has a volatility of 2.49%. This indicates that UBXX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBXX.LIEMB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

2.49%

-1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.32%

5.86%

-3.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85%

7.21%

-4.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.25%

9.50%

-5.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.96%

11.12%

-6.16%

UBXX.L vs. IEMB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBXX.L has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMB.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

UBXX.L vs. IEMB.L - Dividend Comparison

UBXX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.47%, more than IEMB.L's 5.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEMB.L
iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
5.83%5.85%5.80%5.65%5.55%3.95%3.86%4.73%4.82%4.79%5.57%4.78%
UBXX.L
UBS J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF hGBP dis
6.47%25.71%7.05%4.76%4.40%3.91%4.43%6.18%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UBXX.L and IEMB.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IEMB.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEMB.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for UBXX.L.

They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for UBXX.L and 0.45% for IEMB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBXX.L and IEMB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer