PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBXX.L vs. FSEM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBXX.L vs. FSEM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF hGBP dis (UBXX.L) and Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF Inc (FSEM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UBXX.L is traded in GBp, while FSEM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FSEM.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBXX.L achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly lower than FSEM.L's 3.32% return.


UBXX.L

1D
0.01%
1M
0.40%
YTD
2.14%
6M
2.65%
1Y
8.00%
3Y*
8.13%
5Y*
2.38%
10Y*

FSEM.L

1D
0.09%
1M
1.82%
YTD
3.32%
6M
2.73%
1Y
13.62%
3Y*
6.08%
5Y*
2.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBXX.L vs. FSEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UBXX.L
UBS J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF hGBP dis
2.14%9.71%7.01%7.14%-11.07%-0.05%
FSEM.L
Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF Inc
3.29%5.25%5.32%3.38%-8.14%4.21%

Correlation

The correlation between UBXX.L and FSEM.L is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2021

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBXX.L vs. FSEM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBXX.L
UBXX.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
UBXX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBXX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBXX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
UBXX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBXX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

FSEM.L
FSEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FSEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FSEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBXX.L vs. FSEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF hGBP dis (UBXX.L) and Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF Inc (FSEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UBXX.LFSEM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.32

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.13

2.38

+1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.08

6.80

+12.27

UBXX.L vs. FSEM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBXX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the FSEM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBXX.L and FSEM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UBXX.LFSEM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

1.72

+1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.26

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.24

+0.23

Drawdowns

UBXX.L vs. FSEM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBXX.L drawdown since its inception was -16.83%, which is greater than FSEM.L's maximum drawdown of -15.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBXX.L and FSEM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBXX.LFSEM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.83%

-15.36%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.93%

-5.70%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.59%

-9.08%

+6.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.83%

-15.36%

-1.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-1.12%

+1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-6.53%

+2.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.42%

2.00%

-1.58%

Volatility

UBXX.L vs. FSEM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF hGBP dis (UBXX.L) is 0.67%, while Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF Inc (FSEM.L) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that UBXX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBXX.LFSEM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

2.91%

-2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.32%

6.39%

-4.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85%

7.90%

-5.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.25%

10.22%

-5.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.96%

10.13%

-5.17%

UBXX.L vs. FSEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBXX.L has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than FSEM.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

UBXX.L vs. FSEM.L - Dividend Comparison

UBXX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.47%, less than FSEM.L's 7.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FSEM.L
Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF Inc
7.90%6.31%6.49%5.74%5.01%2.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UBXX.L
UBS J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF hGBP dis
6.47%25.71%7.05%4.76%4.40%3.91%4.43%6.18%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


UBXX.L and FSEM.L have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FSEM.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FSEM.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for UBXX.L.

They also come from different issuers: UBS and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for UBXX.L and 0.45% for FSEM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBXX.L and FSEM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer