UBVFX vs. AVERX
UBVFX (Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class R6) and AVERX (Ave Maria Value Focused Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. UBVFX is actively managed, while AVERX is passively managed. Over the past year, UBVFX returned 14.91% vs 16.66% for AVERX. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UBVFX charges 0.80%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for AVERX.
Performance
UBVFX vs. AVERX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBVFX achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly lower than AVERX's 17.13% return.
UBVFX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 2.19%
- YTD
- 7.56%
- 6M
- 8.55%
- 1Y
- 14.91%
- 3Y*
- 12.94%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
AVERX
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -2.04%
- YTD
- 17.13%
- 6M
- 16.12%
- 1Y
- 16.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UBVFX vs. AVERX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UBVFX Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class R6 | 7.56% | 12.40% |
AVERX Ave Maria Value Focused Fund | 17.13% | 0.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBVFX and AVERX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.53 |
The correlation between UBVFX and AVERX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBVFX vs. AVERX — Risk / Return Rank
UBVFX
AVERX
UBVFX vs. AVERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class R6 (UBVFX) and Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UBVFX | AVERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 0.93 | +0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.60 | 1.37 | +0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.17 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 1.72 | -0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.50 | 4.09 | +0.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UBVFX | AVERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 0.93 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.85 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
UBVFX vs. AVERX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBVFX drawdown since its inception was -52.01%, which is greater than AVERX's maximum drawdown of -11.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBVFX and AVERX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBVFX | AVERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.01% | -11.33% | -40.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.31% | -10.27% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.05% | -8.88% | +6.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.21% | -5.73% | -0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.70% | 4.32% | -0.62% |
Volatility
UBVFX vs. AVERX - Volatility Comparison
Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class R6 (UBVFX) and Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX) have volatilities of 4.31% and 4.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBVFX | AVERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 4.32% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.77% | 14.70% | -3.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.70% | 19.00% | -2.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.33% | 18.86% | +1.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.61% | 18.86% | +5.75% |
UBVFX vs. AVERX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UBVFX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than AVERX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
UBVFX vs. AVERX - Dividend Comparison
UBVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.83%, more than AVERX's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVERX Ave Maria Value Focused Fund | 0.35% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UBVFX Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class R6 | 8.83% | 9.49% | 7.47% | 8.43% | 9.05% | 3.53% | 1.08% | 5.07% | 11.74% | 4.75% | 3.31% | 3.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UBVFX and AVERX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVERX has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to UBVFX (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBVFX dropped -52.01% vs AVERX's -11.33%.
UBVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UBVFX and AVERX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer