PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBUR.DE vs. LCUS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBUR.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBUR.DE) and Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


UBUR.DE

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.65%
YTD
0.53%
6M
0.77%
1Y
-1.23%
3Y*
5.82%
5Y*
6.64%
10Y*

LCUS.DE

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBUR.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UBUR.DE
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.53%-5.64%20.63%2.15%-0.28%33.09%-5.58%30.74%5.83%
LCUS.DE
Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.00%3.40%32.87%22.96%-15.87%37.82%9.09%34.14%-0.91%

Correlation

The correlation between UBUR.DE and LCUS.DE is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2018

0.41

The correlation between UBUR.DE and LCUS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (3 years) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBUR.DE vs. LCUS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBUR.DE
UBUR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
UBUR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBUR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBUR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
UBUR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBUR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

LCUS.DE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBUR.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBUR.DE) and Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UBUR.DELCUS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.64

UBUR.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UBUR.DELCUS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

Drawdowns

UBUR.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBUR.DELCUS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.86%

Volatility

UBUR.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBUR.DELCUS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.45%

UBUR.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBUR.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUS.DE's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UBUR.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Dividend Comparison

UBUR.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, while LCUS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCUS.DE
Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.00%0.00%0.84%0.78%2.27%1.12%1.52%1.10%1.30%0.00%
UBUR.DE
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.60%1.87%1.44%1.39%1.28%0.93%1.62%1.40%1.37%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


UBUR.DE and LCUS.DE have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCUS.DE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCUS.DE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for UBUR.DE.

UBUR.DE tracks MSCI USA Select Dynamic 50% Risk Weighted, while LCUS.DE tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for UBUR.DE and 0.04% for LCUS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBUR.DE and LCUS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer