UBUD.DE vs. UEQU.DE
UBUD.DE (UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist) and UEQU.DE (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both exchange-traded funds - UBUD.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners, while UEQU.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UBUD.DE returned 14.59%/yr vs 10.80%/yr for UEQU.DE. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UBUD.DE charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for UEQU.DE.
Performance
UBUD.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBUD.DE achieves a -6.38% return, which is significantly lower than UEQU.DE's 25.53% return. Over the past 10 years, UBUD.DE has outperformed UEQU.DE with an annualized return of 14.59%, while UEQU.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.80% annualized return.
UBUD.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -3.95%
- YTD
- -6.38%
- 6M
- 0.94%
- 1Y
- 47.84%
- 3Y*
- 42.44%
- 5Y*
- 24.10%
- 10Y*
- 14.59%
UEQU.DE
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 25.53%
- 6M
- 28.14%
- 1Y
- 41.09%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 14.40%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
UBUD.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBUD.DE UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist | -6.38% | 144.52% | 34.69% | 6.34% | 0.11% | -8.41% | 15.71% | 40.46% | -6.02% | -3.26% |
UEQU.DE UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 25.53% | 6.36% | 13.03% | -8.33% | 20.34% | 46.31% | -10.57% | 14.71% | -7.23% | 1.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBUD.DE and UEQU.DE is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2016 | 0.20 |
The correlation between UBUD.DE and UEQU.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBUD.DE vs. UEQU.DE — Risk / Return Rank
UBUD.DE
UEQU.DE
UBUD.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UBUD.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UEQU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UBUD.DE | UEQU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.46 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 6.29 | -4.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.06 | 15.25 | -11.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UBUD.DE | UEQU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 2.60 | -1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.85 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.66 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.64 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
UBUD.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBUD.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.79%, which is greater than UEQU.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBUD.DE and UEQU.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBUD.DE | UEQU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.79% | -30.56% | -27.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.94% | -6.50% | -22.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.94% | -15.66% | -13.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.21% | -22.44% | -15.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.40% | -30.56% | -19.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.15% | -1.21% | -25.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.07% | -8.92% | -19.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.75% | 2.69% | +9.06% |
Volatility
UBUD.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UBUD.DE) has a higher volatility of 13.71% compared to UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UEQU.DE) at 3.91%. This indicates that UBUD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UEQU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBUD.DE | UEQU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.71% | 3.91% | +9.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.92% | 13.03% | +22.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.63% | 15.73% | +29.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.68% | 16.83% | +18.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.58% | 16.41% | +19.17% |
UBUD.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UBUD.DE has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than UEQU.DE's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
UBUD.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Dividend Comparison
UBUD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, while UEQU.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBUD.DE UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist | 0.59% | 0.40% | 0.56% | 1.74% | 1.12% | 1.15% | 0.44% | 0.42% | 0.48% | 0.46% | 0.43% | 1.38% |
UEQU.DE UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UBUD.DE and UEQU.DE have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UEQU.DE is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UEQU.DE is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for UBUD.DE.
UBUD.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while UEQU.DE is Commodities. UBUD.DE tracks Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners, while UEQU.DE tracks UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for UBUD.DE and 0.34% for UEQU.DE.
Find the right allocation for UBUD.DE and UEQU.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer