PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBUD.DE vs. PPFB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBUD.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UBUD.DE) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBUD.DE achieves a -6.35% return, which is significantly lower than PPFB.DE's -5.49% return.


UBUD.DE

1D
8.06%
1M
4.25%
6M
-12.33%
YTD
-6.35%
1Y
53.51%
3Y*
48.60%
5Y*
27.63%
10Y*
12.13%
ALL TIME*
6.70%

PPFB.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.58%
6M
-15.16%
YTD
-5.49%
1Y
21.03%
3Y*
26.10%
5Y*
18.64%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
€9.09M€9.21M€9.71M
€784.79K€910.22K€1.57M

UBUD.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UBUD.DE
UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist
-6.35%144.78%34.71%5.73%0.21%-2.64%
PPFB.DE
iShares Physical Gold ETC
-5.49%49.11%34.17%9.42%7.03%2.86%

Correlation

The correlation between UBUD.DE and PPFB.DE is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021

0.72

The correlation between UBUD.DE and PPFB.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBUD.DE vs. PPFB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UBUD.DE
UBUD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
UBUD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBUD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBUD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
UBUD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBUD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

PPFB.DE
PPFB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
PPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UBUD.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UBUD.DE) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UBUD.DEPPFB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.17

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

0.94

+0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.00

1.96

+1.04

UBUD.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBUD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the PPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBUD.DE and PPFB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UBUD.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBUD.DE drawdown since its inception was -71.17%, which is greater than PPFB.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBUD.DE and PPFB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBUD.DEPPFB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.17%

-22.56%

-48.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.53%

-22.56%

-14.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.53%

-22.56%

-14.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.20%

-22.56%

-15.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.16%

-21.81%

-5.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.22%

-4.97%

-32.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.77%

10.75%

+7.02%

Volatility

UBUD.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UBUD.DE) has a higher volatility of 15.32% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) at 6.00%. This indicates that UBUD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPFB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBUD.DEPPFB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.32%

6.00%

+9.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.15%

18.17%

+18.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.63%

24.82%

+24.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.83%

16.55%

+20.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.24%

16.47%

+20.77%

UBUD.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBUD.DE has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than PPFB.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

UBUD.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Dividend Comparison

UBUD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, while PPFB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPFB.DE
iShares Physical Gold ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UBUD.DE
UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist
0.43%0.44%0.61%1.13%1.20%1.38%0.50%0.47%0.56%0.54%0.47%1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


UBUD.DE and PPFB.DE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PPFB.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PPFB.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for UBUD.DE.

UBUD.DE tracks Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners, while PPFB.DE tracks Gold. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for UBUD.DE and 0.12% for PPFB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBUD.DE and PPFB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer