PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBUD.DE vs. BCFE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBUD.DE vs. BCFE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UBUD.DE) and UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (BCFE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBUD.DE achieves a -14.85% return, which is significantly lower than BCFE.DE's 8.60% return.


UBUD.DE

1D
0.73%
1M
-12.25%
YTD
-14.85%
6M
-16.76%
1Y
46.38%
3Y*
42.38%
5Y*
24.27%
10Y*
12.56%

BCFE.DE

1D
1.85%
1M
-8.04%
YTD
8.60%
6M
9.93%
1Y
19.73%
3Y*
9.07%
5Y*
8.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBUD.DE vs. BCFE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UBUD.DE
UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist
-14.85%144.78%34.71%5.73%0.21%-8.24%15.80%40.50%-5.79%1.17%
BCFE.DE
UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
8.60%16.64%3.14%-7.90%14.00%30.29%-0.93%3.55%-10.75%4.20%

Correlation

The correlation between UBUD.DE and BCFE.DE is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017

0.32

The correlation between UBUD.DE and BCFE.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBUD.DE vs. BCFE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBUD.DE
UBUD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
UBUD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBUD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBUD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
UBUD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBUD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

BCFE.DE
BCFE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
BCFE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCFE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCFE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
BCFE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCFE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBUD.DE vs. BCFE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UBUD.DE) and UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (BCFE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UBUD.DEBCFE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.25

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

1.52

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.39

6.93

-3.55

UBUD.DE vs. BCFE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBUD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the BCFE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBUD.DE and BCFE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UBUD.DE vs. BCFE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBUD.DE drawdown since its inception was -71.17%, which is greater than BCFE.DE's maximum drawdown of -32.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBUD.DE and BCFE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBUD.DEBCFE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.17%

-32.94%

-38.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.54%

-12.95%

-23.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.54%

-12.95%

-23.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.20%

-27.27%

-10.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.77%

-11.34%

-22.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.26%

-13.35%

-23.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.66%

2.84%

+10.82%

Volatility

UBUD.DE vs. BCFE.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UBUD.DE) has a higher volatility of 17.53% compared to UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (BCFE.DE) at 4.81%. This indicates that UBUD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCFE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBUD.DEBCFE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.53%

4.81%

+12.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.27%

12.84%

+25.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.35%

14.40%

+32.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.17%

17.59%

+18.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.05%

15.18%

+21.87%

UBUD.DE vs. BCFE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBUD.DE has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than BCFE.DE's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

UBUD.DE vs. BCFE.DE - Dividend Comparison

UBUD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, while BCFE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCFE.DE
UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UBUD.DE
UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist
0.76%0.44%0.61%1.13%1.20%1.38%0.50%0.47%0.56%0.54%0.47%1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


UBUD.DE and BCFE.DE have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BCFE.DE is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BCFE.DE is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for UBUD.DE.

UBUD.DE is categorized as Gold, while BCFE.DE is Commodities. UBUD.DE tracks Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners, while BCFE.DE tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.43% for UBUD.DE and 0.34% for BCFE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBUD.DE and BCFE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer