PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBU5.DE vs. CSH.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBU5.DE vs. CSH.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBU5.DE) and Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBU5.DE achieves a 11.44% return, which is significantly higher than CSH.PA's 0.78% return. Over the past 10 years, UBU5.DE has outperformed CSH.PA with an annualized return of 9.94%, while CSH.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 0.92% annualized return.


UBU5.DE

1D
0.60%
1M
3.72%
YTD
11.44%
6M
11.93%
1Y
20.18%
3Y*
13.20%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*
9.94%

CSH.PA

1D
0.01%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.78%
6M
0.98%
1Y
1.99%
3Y*
2.96%
5Y*
1.89%
10Y*
0.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBU5.DE vs. CSH.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UBU5.DE
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
11.44%1.10%19.93%6.38%-1.60%38.43%-9.93%27.91%-4.61%0.74%
CSH.PA
Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc
0.78%2.25%3.69%3.22%-0.06%-0.65%1.93%-0.61%-0.55%-0.45%

Correlation

The correlation between UBU5.DE and CSH.PA is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2012

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBU5.DE vs. CSH.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBU5.DE
UBU5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
UBU5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBU5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBU5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
UBU5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBU5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

CSH.PA
CSH.PA Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBU5.DE vs. CSH.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBU5.DE) and Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UBU5.DECSH.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.96

-0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.28

11.24

-6.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.64

57.34

-42.70

UBU5.DE vs. CSH.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBU5.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is lower than the CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio of 3.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBU5.DE and CSH.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UBU5.DECSH.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

3.96

-1.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

5.28

-4.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

1.41

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.79

-0.04

Drawdowns

UBU5.DE vs. CSH.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBU5.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.36%, which is greater than CSH.PA's maximum drawdown of -3.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBU5.DE and CSH.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBU5.DECSH.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.36%

-3.73%

-32.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.70%

-0.18%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.90%

-0.18%

-19.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.90%

-0.77%

-19.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.36%

-2.27%

-34.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-1.04%

-3.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

0.03%

+1.35%

Volatility

UBU5.DE vs. CSH.PA - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBU5.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.15% compared to Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) at 0.09%. This indicates that UBU5.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSH.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBU5.DECSH.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.15%

0.09%

+2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.40%

0.41%

+5.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.72%

0.50%

+9.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.36%

0.35%

+13.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.47%

0.64%

+14.83%

UBU5.DE vs. CSH.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBU5.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than CSH.PA's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UBU5.DE vs. CSH.PA - Dividend Comparison

UBU5.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, while CSH.PA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSH.PA
Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.05%0.05%2.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UBU5.DE
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.17%1.95%1.60%2.86%1.80%1.27%2.18%1.75%2.10%1.81%2.10%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


UBU5.DE and CSH.PA have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSH.PA is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSH.PA is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for UBU5.DE.

UBU5.DE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while CSH.PA is Money Market. UBU5.DE tracks MSCI USA Value, while CSH.PA tracks Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UBU5.DE and 0.10% for CSH.PA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBU5.DE and CSH.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer