PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBS vs. SLF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UBS vs. SLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS Group AG (UBS) and Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBS achieves a 7.11% return, which is significantly lower than SLF's 25.30% return. Over the past 10 years, UBS has outperformed SLF with an annualized return of 16.67%, while SLF has yielded a comparatively lower 13.18% annualized return.


UBS

1D
1.62%
1M
5.81%
YTD
7.11%
6M
14.79%
1Y
51.82%
3Y*
38.69%
5Y*
27.89%
10Y*
16.67%

SLF

1D
1.05%
1M
9.27%
YTD
25.30%
6M
29.43%
1Y
22.99%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
13.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBS vs. SLF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UBS
UBS Group AG
7.11%60.21%2.03%67.65%5.92%27.93%17.99%7.15%-32.68%21.53%
SLF
Sun Life Financial Inc.
25.30%9.72%19.48%17.77%-12.89%29.71%1.55%42.69%-16.37%11.18%

Correlation

The correlation between UBS and SLF is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2014

0.54

The correlation between UBS and SLF shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.55 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UBS:

$198.06B

SLF:

$30.85B

EPS

UBS:

$2.24

SLF:

CA$6.22

PE Ratio

UBS:

21.89

SLF:

17.21

PS Ratio

UBS:

2.67

SLF:

1.43

PB Ratio

UBS:

2.14

SLF:

1.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

UBS:

$64.08B

SLF:

CA$39.40B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UBS:

$42.48B

SLF:

CA$20.48B

EBITDA (TTM)

UBS:

$11.15B

SLF:

CA$4.74B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBS vs. SLF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBS
UBS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
UBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBS Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
UBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SLF
SLF Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLF Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLF Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBS vs. SLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Group AG (UBS) and Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UBSSLFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.23

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

1.55

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.33

3.34

+1.99

UBS vs. SLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBS Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the SLF Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBS and SLF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UBS vs. SLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBS drawdown since its inception was -61.38%, smaller than the maximum SLF drawdown of -78.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBS and SLF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBSSLFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.38%

-78.60%

+17.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.07%

-14.91%

-11.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.00%

-14.91%

-12.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.41%

-30.77%

-2.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.38%

-50.84%

-10.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.22%

-16.86%

-2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.76%

6.90%

+2.86%

Volatility

UBS vs. SLF - Volatility Comparison

UBS Group AG (UBS) has a higher volatility of 7.66% compared to Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF) at 4.82%. This indicates that UBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBSSLFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.66%

4.82%

+2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.57%

14.14%

+6.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.91%

20.20%

+5.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.35%

19.44%

+10.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.37%

22.88%

+7.49%

Dividends

UBS vs. SLF - Dividend Comparison

UBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than SLF's 3.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLF
Sun Life Financial Inc.
3.47%4.03%4.00%4.98%4.59%3.32%3.69%3.47%4.71%3.17%3.98%4.64%
UBS
UBS Group AG
1.12%2.92%3.46%0.89%1.34%1.04%3.87%5.48%0.00%3.30%5.42%3.87%

Financials

UBS vs. SLF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UBS Group AG and Sun Life Financial Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-5.00B0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
20.20B
8.88B
(UBS) Total Revenue
(SLF) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. UBS values in USD, SLF values in CAD

UBS vs. SLF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between UBS Group AG and Sun Life Financial Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
71.8%
100.0%
Portfolio components
UBS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UBS Group AG reported a gross profit of 14.51B and revenue of 20.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.8%.

SLF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.88B and revenue of 8.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

UBS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UBS Group AG reported an operating income of 3.77B and revenue of 20.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.7%.

SLF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported an operating income of 633.63M and revenue of 8.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.

UBS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UBS Group AG reported a net income of 2.98B and revenue of 20.20B, resulting in a net margin of 14.8%.

SLF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported a net income of 537.39M and revenue of 8.88B, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UBS and SLF have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UBS has higher volatility (7.66%) compared to SLF (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBS dropped -61.38% vs SLF's -78.60%.

UBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBS and SLF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer