UBR vs. TERG
UBR (ProShares Ultra MSCI Brazil) and TERG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. UBR is passively managed, while TERG is actively managed. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. UBR charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TERG.
Performance
UBR vs. TERG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBR achieves a 23.81% return, which is significantly lower than TERG's 115.96% return.
UBR
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- 10.89%
- 6M
- -9.85%
- YTD
- 23.81%
- 1Y
- 79.72%
- 3Y*
- 7.74%
- 5Y*
- 0.25%
- 10Y*
- -5.26%
- ALL TIME*
- -12.23%
TERG
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -8.97%
- 6M
- 33.85%
- YTD
- 115.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.10M | $2.30M | $4.80M | |
| $56.44K | $45.60K | $86.71K |
UBR vs. TERG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UBR ProShares Ultra MSCI Brazil | 23.81% | -3.38% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 115.96% | 20.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBR and TERG is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBR vs. TERG — Risk / Return Rank
UBR
TERG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UBR vs. TERG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Brazil (UBR) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UBR | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.18 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UBR vs. TERG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBR drawdown since its inception was -97.15%, which is greater than TERG's maximum drawdown of -60.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBR and TERG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBR | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.15% | -60.59% | -36.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.16% | -49.20% | -42.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -78.03% | -19.00% | -59.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.43% | — | — |
Volatility
UBR vs. TERG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBR | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.82% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.83% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.74% | 157.62% | -107.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.14% | 157.62% | -102.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.23% | 157.62% | -91.39% |
UBR vs. TERG - Expense Ratio Comparison
UBR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TERG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
UBR vs. TERG - Dividend Comparison
UBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, while TERG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UBR ProShares Ultra MSCI Brazil | 1.59% | 2.05% | 8.09% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.53% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UBR and TERG have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TERG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TERG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UBR.
UBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.00% for TERG.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UBR and 0.75% for TERG.
Find the right allocation for UBR and TERG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer