UBPIX vs. DXQLX
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund (UBPIX) and Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX).
UBPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Oct 15, 2007. DXQLX is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the . It was launched on May 1, 2006.
Performance
UBPIX vs. DXQLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UBPIX vs. DXQLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBPIX ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund | 33.79% | 88.27% | -39.96% | 53.61% | 9.98% | -10.66% | -50.10% | 13.18% | -22.18% | 46.59% |
DXQLX Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund | -16.65% | 29.99% | 39.26% | 97.59% | -57.72% | 55.98% | 100.94% | 79.36% | -81.54% | 743.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBPIX achieves a 33.79% return, which is significantly higher than DXQLX's -16.65% return. Over the past 10 years, UBPIX has underperformed DXQLX with an annualized return of 5.76%, while DXQLX has yielded a comparatively higher 28.82% annualized return.
UBPIX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -9.02%
- YTD
- 33.79%
- 6M
- 62.79%
- 1Y
- 105.99%
- 3Y*
- 30.43%
- 5Y*
- 20.55%
- 10Y*
- 5.76%
DXQLX
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -14.31%
- YTD
- -16.65%
- 6M
- -14.21%
- 1Y
- 28.10%
- 3Y*
- 30.01%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 28.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UBPIX vs. DXQLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UBPIX has a 1.73% expense ratio, which is higher than DXQLX's 1.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UBPIX vs. DXQLX — Risk / Return Rank
UBPIX
DXQLX
UBPIX vs. DXQLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund (UBPIX) and Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UBPIX | DXQLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.31 | 0.70 | +1.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.60 | 1.31 | +1.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.18 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.99 | 0.99 | +2.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.50 | 3.53 | +10.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UBPIX | DXQLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 0.70 | +1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.33 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 | 0.09 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.16 | 0.01 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between UBPIX and DXQLX is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
UBPIX vs. DXQLX - Dividend Comparison
UBPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, less than DXQLX's 17.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBPIX ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund | 3.76% | 5.03% | 6.94% | 4.32% | 10.96% | 6.00% | 0.53% | 1.28% | 1.58% | 0.22% | 0.32% | 0.43% |
DXQLX Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund | 17.75% | 14.50% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.75% | 10.90% | 3.37% | 7.37% | 5.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
UBPIX vs. DXQLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBPIX drawdown since its inception was -98.57%, roughly equal to the maximum DXQLX drawdown of -97.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBPIX and DXQLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBPIX | DXQLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.57% | -97.24% | -1.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.74% | -22.05% | -2.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.18% | -60.79% | +11.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.02% | -87.23% | -1.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.15% | -21.88% | -68.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.66% | -66.36% | -18.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.80% | 6.20% | +0.60% |
Volatility
UBPIX vs. DXQLX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund (UBPIX) has a higher volatility of 19.88% compared to Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX) at 9.63%. This indicates that UBPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXQLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UBPIX | DXQLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.88% | 9.63% | +10.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.21% | 21.96% | +10.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.04% | 40.19% | +4.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.26% | 42.24% | +4.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.36% | 316.44% | -260.08% |