PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBOT vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBOT vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares (UBOT) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBOT achieves a -2.62% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 38.71% return.


UBOT

1D
1.17%
1M
-6.03%
6M
-3.64%
YTD
-2.62%
1Y
7.15%
3Y*
7.92%
5Y*
-9.02%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-5.68%

TQQQ

1D
-2.65%
1M
-4.68%
6M
46.96%
YTD
38.71%
1Y
71.21%
3Y*
54.16%
5Y*
17.51%
10Y*
40.49%
ALL TIME*
43.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.00B$4.56B$5.34B
$403.24K$375.59K$557.36K

UBOT vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UBOT
Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares
-2.62%13.42%12.02%72.59%-72.45%9.78%80.13%87.34%-71.74%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
38.71%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-30.14%

Correlation

The correlation between UBOT and TQQQ is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2018

0.79

The correlation between UBOT and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

UBOT vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UBOT
TQQQ

Industrials

50.8%
2.8%

Technology

30.8%
53.8%

Healthcare

8.0%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%
12.3%

Communication Services

4.2%
15.8%

Financial Services

0.9%
0.2%

Energy

0.5%
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
7.7%

Basic Materials

0.0%
1.1%

Utilities

0.0%
1.4%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Industrials

UBOT
50.8%
TQQQ
2.8%

Technology

UBOT
30.8%
TQQQ
53.8%

Healthcare

UBOT
8.0%
TQQQ
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

UBOT
6.2%
TQQQ
12.3%

Communication Services

UBOT
4.2%
TQQQ
15.8%

Financial Services

UBOT
0.9%
TQQQ
0.2%

Energy

UBOT
0.5%
TQQQ
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

UBOT
0.0%
TQQQ
7.7%

Basic Materials

UBOT
0.0%
TQQQ
1.1%

Utilities

UBOT
0.0%
TQQQ
1.4%

Real Estate

UBOT

-

TQQQ
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBOT vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UBOT
UBOT Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
UBOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBOT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
UBOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBOT Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UBOT vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares (UBOT) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UBOTTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.22

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

1.94

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.47

5.34

-4.87

UBOT vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBOT Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBOT and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UBOT vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBOT drawdown since its inception was -86.24%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBOT and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBOTTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.24%

-81.66%

-4.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.64%

-36.97%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.64%

-58.04%

+6.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.90%

-81.66%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.85%

-16.29%

-36.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.91%

-18.49%

-31.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.36%

13.38%

+1.98%

Volatility

UBOT vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares (UBOT) is 16.80%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 21.96%. This indicates that UBOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBOTTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.80%

21.96%

-5.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.30%

48.60%

-5.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.63%

58.14%

-5.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.11%

68.26%

-14.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.54%

66.67%

-3.13%

UBOT vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBOT has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

UBOT vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

UBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than TQQQ's 0.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.52%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%
UBOT
Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares
1.01%0.78%1.45%0.65%0.00%2.25%15.83%0.55%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UBOT and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (21.96%) compared to UBOT (16.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBOT dropped -86.24% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 5-year performance, TQQQ leads with 17.51% vs -9.02% for UBOT. On fees, TQQQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, UBOT has been the lower-risk option at 16.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 17.51% return vs -9.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TQQQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for UBOT.

UBOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.52% for TQQQ.

UBOT is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. UBOT tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index (300%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for UBOT and 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBOT and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer