UBOT vs. FAS

Last updated Jun 10, 2026

UBOT (Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares) and FAS (Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - UBOT is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index (300%), while FAS is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UBOT returned -8.73%/yr vs 6.62%/yr for FAS. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UBOT charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for FAS.

Performance

UBOT vs. FAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares (UBOT) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBOT achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly higher than FAS's -17.44% return.

UBOT

• 1D: -3.94%
• 1M: -18.79%
• YTD: 1.33%
• 6M: -1.78%
• 1Y: 28.53%
• 3Y*: 6.89%
• 5Y*: -8.73%
• 10Y*: —

FAS

• 1D: 2.86%
• 1M: 6.03%
• YTD: -17.44%
• 6M: -9.85%
• 1Y: -3.37%
• 3Y*: 36.76%
• 5Y*: 6.62%
• 10Y*: 19.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBOT vs. FAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
UBOT Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares	1.33%	13.42%	12.02%	72.59%	-72.45%	9.78%	80.13%	87.34%	-71.74%
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares	-17.44%	21.48%	84.47%	14.92%	-43.19%	116.59%	-34.97%	113.04%	-29.23%

Correlation

The correlation between UBOT and FAS is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2018	0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between UBOT and FAS has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

UBOT vs. FAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UBOT	FAS
Industrials	48.6%	0.2%
Technology	31.8%	1.7%
Healthcare	9.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.1%	-
Communication Services	4.5%	-
Financial Services	0.9%	98.0%
Energy	0.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	0.0%	-
Utilities	0.0%	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

UBOT vs. FAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBOT

UBOT Risk / Return Rank: 21
UBOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
UBOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
UBOT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
UBOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
UBOT Martin Ratio Rank: 22

FAS

FAS Risk / Return Rank: 9
FAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
FAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
FAS Omega Ratio Rank: 10
FAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
FAS Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBOT vs. FAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares (UBOT) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UBOT	FAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.58	-0.08	+0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.13	0.19	+0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.02	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.80	-0.08	+0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.50	-0.19	+2.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UBOT vs. FAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBOT Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is higher than the FAS Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBOT and FAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UBOT	FAS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58	-0.08	+0.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.17	0.12	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.08	0.17	-0.26

Drawdowns

UBOT vs. FAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBOT drawdown since its inception was -86.24%, smaller than the maximum FAS drawdown of -91.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBOT and FAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	UBOT	FAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.24%	-91.61%	+5.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.90%	-40.88%	+4.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-51.64%	-43.10%	-8.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-82.90%	-66.88%	-16.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-85.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.94%	-24.24%	-26.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.81%	-31.12%	-18.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.42%	17.79%	-6.37%

Volatility

UBOT vs. FAS - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares (UBOT) has a higher volatility of 16.20% compared to Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) at 12.33%. This indicates that UBOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UBOT	FAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.20%	12.33%	+3.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.59%	33.34%	+4.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.07%	43.37%	+5.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.14%	55.59%	-2.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.51%	61.35%	+2.16%

UBOT vs. FAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBOT has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FAS's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

UBOT vs. FAS - Dividend Comparison

UBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than FAS's 10.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares	10.10%	8.21%	0.76%	1.77%	0.91%	0.60%	0.47%	0.62%	1.43%	0.11%
UBOT Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares	0.92%	0.78%	1.45%	0.65%	0.00%	2.25%	15.83%	0.55%	0.33%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UBOT and FAS in my portfolio?

UBOT and FAS have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UBOT or FAS?

UBOT has higher volatility (16.20%) compared to FAS (12.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBOT dropped -86.24% vs FAS's -91.61%.

Which ETF is better, UBOT or FAS?

On 5-year performance, FAS leads with 6.62% vs -8.73% for UBOT. On fees, FAS is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, FAS has been the lower-risk option at 12.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UBOT or FAS?

Over the 5-year period, FAS has performed better with a 6.62% return vs -8.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UBOT or FAS?

FAS is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for UBOT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UBOT or FAS?

FAS has the higher dividend yield at 10.10%, compared with 0.92% for UBOT.

What is the main difference between UBOT and FAS?

UBOT is categorized as Robotics, while FAS is Leveraged Equities. UBOT tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index (300%), while FAS tracks Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.29% for UBOT and 1.00% for FAS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UBOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.